Derivation of Rocket Equation Using Relative Velocity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
lowea001
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
Based on my current understanding of the problem I do not see this following derivation as valid, although this is what was given in my course notes. Although this particular example is from an undergraduate physics course this is not a homework problem: I'm confused about the underlying concept. I will highlight below the specific step I do not understand. Here is the given derivation of the rocket equation:

A rocket of mass [itex]M_{0}[/itex] (excluding fuel) originally has fuel of mass [itex]m_{0}[/itex] which is being ejected at constant velocity [itex]u[/itex] downward, relative to the rocket at a constant rate [itex]\frac{dm}{dt}[/itex]. By conservation of momentum, the rocket acquires a velocity [itex]v[/itex] upward. Applying momentum conservation in the frame of an observer we have:
[tex]\frac{d(M(t)v)}{dt} = M(t)\frac{dv}{dt} + v\frac{dM(t)}{dt} = (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}[/tex] ***the expression after the last equals sign is what I do not get. ***
Since [itex]dM=dm[/itex] we have:
[tex]M(t)\frac{dv}{dt} = -\frac{dM(t)}{dt}u[/tex]
which is the rocket equation.
Okay, so most of that makes sense (kind of), but the relative velocity part seems kind of questionable (or hand-wavy at the very least) since the entire premise behind being able to treat a fluid's change in momentum being only due to its rate of change of mass is that the velocity is constant, which it is clearly not in the case of v - u. In other words, why does the force from a fluid equation [itex]F = v\frac{dm}{dt}[/itex] still work if v is not constant, but changing with time? Shouldn't the right hand side of the line in question read [itex]\frac{dm(v-u)}{dt} = \frac{dm}{dt}v + \frac{dv}{dt}m - \frac{dm}{dt}u[/itex] since v isn't constant? Sorry, I tried to make this as succinct as possible. If someone could point me in the general direction and help me understand how I am misunderstanding this idea I would be very grateful. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first step, d(mv)/dt= mdv/dt+vdm/dt, is problematic. In effect, it treats the mass m(t) of a closed system as something that can vary. This is of course nonsense. Ending up with the right rocket equation appears to be via some sleight of hand, and I think it is that part that had you foxed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lowea001