Derivation of Rocket Equation Using Relative Velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the rocket equation using conservation of momentum, specifically questioning the validity of the expression derived from relative velocity. The derivation involves a rocket of mass M0 with fuel mass m0 ejected at a constant velocity u. The key point of contention is the treatment of the mass change in the momentum equation, particularly the expression d(M(t)v)/dt = M(t)dv/dt + v dM(t)/dt, which the user finds problematic. The conclusion emphasizes that the treatment of mass as a variable in a closed system leads to confusion and potential inaccuracies in the derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum in physics
  • Familiarity with the rocket equation and its components
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly derivatives and rates of change
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics and relative velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the rocket equation in detail, focusing on conservation laws
  • Learn about the implications of variable mass systems in classical mechanics
  • Explore fluid dynamics principles, particularly the effects of velocity on momentum
  • Investigate advanced topics in calculus related to derivatives of products and variable mass
USEFUL FOR

Students in undergraduate physics courses, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of rocket propulsion and momentum conservation.

lowea001
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
Based on my current understanding of the problem I do not see this following derivation as valid, although this is what was given in my course notes. Although this particular example is from an undergraduate physics course this is not a homework problem: I'm confused about the underlying concept. I will highlight below the specific step I do not understand. Here is the given derivation of the rocket equation:

A rocket of mass M_{0} (excluding fuel) originally has fuel of mass m_{0} which is being ejected at constant velocity u downward, relative to the rocket at a constant rate \frac{dm}{dt}. By conservation of momentum, the rocket acquires a velocity v upward. Applying momentum conservation in the frame of an observer we have:
\frac{d(M(t)v)}{dt} = M(t)\frac{dv}{dt} + v\frac{dM(t)}{dt} = (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt} ***the expression after the last equals sign is what I do not get. ***
Since dM=dm we have:
M(t)\frac{dv}{dt} = -\frac{dM(t)}{dt}u
which is the rocket equation.
Okay, so most of that makes sense (kind of), but the relative velocity part seems kind of questionable (or hand-wavy at the very least) since the entire premise behind being able to treat a fluid's change in momentum being only due to its rate of change of mass is that the velocity is constant, which it is clearly not in the case of v - u. In other words, why does the force from a fluid equation F = v\frac{dm}{dt} still work if v is not constant, but changing with time? Shouldn't the right hand side of the line in question read \frac{dm(v-u)}{dt} = \frac{dm}{dt}v + \frac{dv}{dt}m - \frac{dm}{dt}u since v isn't constant? Sorry, I tried to make this as succinct as possible. If someone could point me in the general direction and help me understand how I am misunderstanding this idea I would be very grateful. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first step, d(mv)/dt= mdv/dt+vdm/dt, is problematic. In effect, it treats the mass m(t) of a closed system as something that can vary. This is of course nonsense. Ending up with the right rocket equation appears to be via some sleight of hand, and I think it is that part that had you foxed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lowea001

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
1K