Derivation of the Laue Equation -- Problem with path difference

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the Laue equation, specifically focusing on the path difference between two rays as described in a textbook. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the sign of the path difference and its implications in the derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the signs of dot products in relation to the vectors involved in the path difference calculation. Questions arise about the interpretation of angles between vectors and how these affect the sign of the path difference.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the geometric interpretation of the vectors and their dot products, suggesting that the angle between the vectors is crucial for understanding the signs involved. There is an acknowledgment of potential discrepancies in the textbook's explanation, but no consensus is reached on the correctness of the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the reliance on a diagram from the textbook, which may influence their understanding of the path difference and the associated signs. The discussion highlights the importance of visual representation in vector analysis.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand the Laue equation but I have problems unterstanding the derivation, especially one part in my textbook about the path difference (see attachment)



The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook says that the path difference here is:
\Delta s = \vec T \hat{s_0} - \vec T \hat{s}

But why is there a minus? I thought there has to be a plus (like in the derivation of the Bragg equation) because when I look at the picture in the attachment, the ray which is on bottom has to travel dS1 and dS2 in addition. Where is my mistake?

Thanks for your help everyone. If anything is unclear just ask, I know my English is not the best.
 

Attachments

  • laue.png
    laue.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 1,544
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Note the signs of the dot products ##\vec{T} \cdot \hat{s}_0## and ##\vec{T} \cdot \hat{s}'##.

In particular, for your diagram, is ##\Delta s_1 = \vec{T} \cdot \hat{s}_0## a positive quantity or a negative quantity?
 
I think it's positive. I didn't create the sketch, I took it out of my textbook. I still don't understand why dS2 is negative.
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I think it's positive. I didn't create the sketch, I took it out of my textbook. I still don't understand why dS2 is negative.

What can you say about the angle between ##\vec{T}## and ##\vec{s}_0##? (Not a precise value, just a range). What can you say about the dot product between vectors with an angle in that range?
 
I know when the angle is between 0 and 90 degrees the dot product is positive. for 90 to 180 degrees it's negative. This may sound stupid, but I have a problem understanding this when I take a look at the sketch because the tip of the S0 vector touches the T vector. How do I cope with this? It's quite embarrassing that I don't know how I calculate a dot product this way, but I've never stumpled upon such a problem. I add an attachment so you know what I mean by "when the tip of one vector touches the other".

Thanks for your help
 

Attachments

  • vec.png
    vec.png
    421 bytes · Views: 705
The angle between vectors as it occurs in the cross product, \vec{x} \cdot \vec{y}=|\vec{x}| |\vec{y}| \cos \theta with \theta \in [0,\pi] is defined to be the angle between the vectors with their starting points coinciding, i.e., in your figure you have to parallel shift one of the vectors such that it's starting point coincides with the starting point of the other vector. Then the angle at this pivot point is the one relevant in the scalar product! In your drawing this angle is obviously between \pi/2 and \pi and thus the scalar product id negative (because the cosine is negative in this range).
 
So the dot product of T and S0 in my first attachment is negative and the dot product of T and S' is positive? If that's the case I think my textbook is wrong :o
 
Lindsayyyy said:
So the dot product of T and S0 in my first attachment is negative and the dot product of T and S' is positive?

Yes.

If that's the case I think my textbook is wrong :o

You might be right. In the diagram, Δs = Δs1 - Δs2 would be a negative number, whereas the diagram seems to be deriving an expression for the positive extra distance that the bottom ray travels relative to the top ray.

But note that the magnitude of Δs = Δs1 - Δs2 does give the correct magnitude of the path difference of the two rays. So, it depends on how the text makes use of the expression for Δs as to whether the overall derivation of the Laue equation is wrong.
 
Alright, I got it now. Thank your very much for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K