Derivation of the Yang-Mills 3 gauge boson vertex

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the three gauge-boson vertex in Yang-Mills theories, specifically focusing on the interaction term in the Lagrangian represented as $$\mathcal{L}_{YM} \supset g \,f^{ijk}A_{\mu}{}^{(j)} A_{\nu}{}^{(k)} \partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}{}^{(i)}$$. The user seeks clarification on how to derive the expression $$ g f^{abc} \left[ g^{\mu \nu} (k-p)^\rho + g^{\nu \rho} (p-q)^\mu + g^{\rho \mu} (q-k)^\nu \right]$$ from the rewritten Lagrangian, emphasizing the role of gauge field momenta and the contributions from different field connections. The key takeaway is that there are six terms resulting from the combinations of field connections and derivatives, which collectively yield the correct Feynman rule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Yang-Mills theories
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian formalism in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of Feynman rules and gauge boson interactions
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and momentum conservation in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the three gauge-boson vertex in Yang-Mills theories using Peskin & Schroeder's "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory"
  • Learn about the implications of the structure constants $$f^{ijk}$$ in gauge theories
  • Explore the role of anti-symmetrization in field theory calculations
  • Investigate the application of momentum conservation in deriving Feynman rules for gauge interactions
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and researchers focusing on gauge theories and particle interactions.

takunitoche
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I can't seem to derive the vertex rules from the Yang-Mills lagrangian. I struggle to properly identify the origin of each momentum and the indices associated.
Hello everyone,

I am stuck in the derivation of the three gauge-boson-vertex in Yang-Mills theories. The relevant interaction term in the Lagrangian is$$\mathcal{L}_{YM} \supset g \,f^{ijk}A_{\mu}{}^{(j)} A_{\nu}{}^{(k)} \partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}{}^{(i)} $$


I have rewritten this term using the total asymmetry of the structure constants:

$$\mathcal{L}_{YM} \supset \dfrac{g}{6} f^{ijk} \left[ A_{\mu}{}^{(j)} A_{\nu}{}^{(k)} (\partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}{}^{(i)} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}{}^{(i)}) + A_{\mu}{}^{(i)} A_{\nu}{}^{(k)} (\partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}{}^{(j)} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}{}^{(j)}) + A_{\mu}{}^{(k)} A_{\nu}{}^{(i)} (\partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}{}^{(j)} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}{}^{(j)})\right] $$Now consider the following diagram (from Peskin & Schroeder, section 16.1): View attachment 250501

This is where I'm stuck: I know that the derivative of the field will make the momenta appear in the expression. The problem is that I do not understand which gauge field momentum appears from which derivative, and how to go from this expression to the answer, which is

$$ g f^{abc} \left[ g^{\mu \nu} (k-p)^\rho + g^{\nu \rho} (p-q)^\mu + g^{\rho \mu} (q-k)^\nu \right] $$

where the momenta and indices are taken according to the attached diagram.

Huge thanks for any help you might bring!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In all honesty, writing out the anti-symmetrization explicitly will not help you much, it will rather serve to complicate things.

The main thing to keep in mind here is that there are three different possibilities for which field to connect to the derivative term. Each of these possibilities contribute with its own term to the Feynman rule - where the momentum is the momentum corresponding to that possibility - and in each of these possibilities you have two different possibilities for connecting the other fields so in total you have six terms. Just collecting these six terms in an appropriate manner should give you the correct Feynman rule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K