I Derivation of two-electron density operator

Mart1234
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Derivation of two electron density operator using single electron density operator
Hello, I am going over the derivation for two-electron density. I am having a hard time understanding how the second term in 2.11a seen below is derived. I know this term must eliminate the i=j products but can't seem to understand how. Thanks for the help.
1677185633960.png
 

Attachments

  • 1677185491730.png
    1677185491730.png
    18.1 KB · Views: 160
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is this coming from? The 2nd equality of (2.11a) seems to indicate that you consider a special state of uncorrelated/free particles, but we need more context to make sense of it.
 
I've never seen the two-electron density written like that. Here are my thoughts but I can't say for sure.

Mart1234 said:
I know this term must eliminate the i=j products but can't seem to understand how.
Considering the terms where ##i=j## $$\sum_{i}\delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r' - \mathbf r_i)$$We should be able to use the identities ##\delta(x - y) = \delta(y - x)## and ##\int dy \delta(x-y)\delta(y-x') = \delta(x-x')## So we rewrite the above as $$\sum_{i}\delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r_i - \mathbf r')$$ and when we are computing the electron density function we will be integrating over ##\mathbf r_i## so the latter identity suggests $$\sum_i\int d\mathbf r_1\dots d\mathbf r_N \delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r_i - \mathbf r')|\Psi(\mathbf r_1,\dots, \mathbf r_N)|^2 = N\int d\mathbf r_2\dots d\mathbf r_N \delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf r')|\Psi(\mathbf r,\dots, \mathbf r_N)|^2$$For the last line. I am assuming $$\int dx\int dy \delta(x-y)\delta(y-x')f(y) = \int dx \delta(x-x')f(x)$$
 
Last edited:
Morbert said:
I've never seen the two-electron density written like that. Here are my thoughts but I can't say for sure.Considering the terms where ##i=j## $$\sum_{i}\delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r' - \mathbf r_i)$$We should be able to use the identities ##\delta(x - y) = \delta(y - x)## and ##\int dy \delta(x-y)\delta(y-x') = \delta(x-x')## So we rewrite the above as $$\sum_{i}\delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r_i - \mathbf r')$$ and when we are computing the electron density function we will be integrating over ##\mathbf r_i## so the latter identity suggests $$\sum_i\int d\mathbf r_1\dots d\mathbf r_N \delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r_i - \mathbf r')|\Psi(\mathbf r_1,\dots, \mathbf r_N)|^2 = N\int d\mathbf r_2\dots d\mathbf r_N \delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf r')|\Psi(\mathbf r,\dots, \mathbf r_N)|^2$$For the last line. I am assuming $$\int dx\int dy \delta(x-y)\delta(y-x')f(y) = \int dx \delta(x-x')f(x)$$

Morbert said:
I've never seen the two-electron density written like that. Here are my thoughts but I can't say for sure.Considering the terms where ##i=j## $$\sum_{i}\delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r' - \mathbf r_i)$$We should be able to use the identities ##\delta(x - y) = \delta(y - x)## and ##\int dy \delta(x-y)\delta(y-x') = \delta(x-x')## So we rewrite the above as $$\sum_{i}\delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r_i - \mathbf r')$$ and when we are computing the electron density function we will be integrating over ##\mathbf r_i## so the latter identity suggests $$\sum_i\int d\mathbf r_1\dots d\mathbf r_N \delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf r_i)\delta(\mathbf r_i - \mathbf r')|\Psi(\mathbf r_1,\dots, \mathbf r_N)|^2 = N\int d\mathbf r_2\dots d\mathbf r_N \delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf r')|\Psi(\mathbf r,\dots, \mathbf r_N)|^2$$For the last line. I am assuming $$\int dx\int dy \delta(x-y)\delta(y-x')f(y) = \int dx \delta(x-x')f(x)$$
Got it. I appreciate the help.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top