Derivative/Antiderivative Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter t_n_p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between a function and its antiderivative, specifically focusing on determining local maxima and minima of the antiderivative graph based on the given piecewise linear function. Participants explore the implications of the first and second derivatives in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss identifying stationary points on the graph of f(x) and their implications for g(x). There are attempts to calculate corresponding y-values for g(x) at specific x-coordinates based on the area under the curve. Questions arise regarding the intervals of increase and concavity of g(x), as well as the relationship between the derivatives of f(x) and g(x).

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered guidance on how to approach finding the y-values for g(x) and understanding the concavity based on the behavior of f(x). There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the derivatives and the graphical behavior of the functions, with some participants confirming the correctness of intervals and reasoning presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of piecewise linear functions and their integrals.

t_n_p
Messages
593
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/1751/untitled3zt8.jpg

If g(x) is an antiderivative of f(x) and g(0)=2, detemine the x-coordinates of the points on the graph of g(x) corresponding to its local max and min values.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that stationary points occur when y=0 on the f(x) graph (i.e. at x=1 and x=3.5). I also know that at x=1 it's a maximum and at x=3.5 it's a minimum, but how do I find the corresponding y-values?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
By "integrating". You could, of course, find the equation for f itself since it is "piecewise linear" but that isn't necessary. The integral of f is the area under the graph and, from x= 0 to x= 1, that is just a the area of a triangle. Don't forget to add the initial value, g(0)= 2. One you know g(1), you can find g(3.5) by "adding" the area under the curve from 1 to 3.5. I put "adding" in quotes because that value is actually negative, since the curve is below the x-axis.

To find g(1), Find the area of the triangle with base 1 and height 1 and add that to g(0)= 2. To find g(3.5), find the area of the trapezoid with height 1, bases 2.5 and 1, and subtract that from g(1).
 
ah gotcha thanks!

A turning point on the graph of f refers to a point of inflexion on the graph g, so does that mean that g(x) is increasing for (0,1), (3.5,4) and (4,6)?

Also, how would I find where g(x) is concave up/down?
 
Well, what does the second derivative of g(x) tell you?
 
Hootenanny said:
Well, what does the second derivative of g(x) tell you?

Well I do know f"(x)>0 represents concave up and f"(x)<0 represents concave down, but how can I get f"(x) (i.e. the derivative of g)

P.S. are my intervals for increasing g(x) correct?
 
But...

detemine the x-coordinates of the points on the graph of g(x) corresponding to its local max and min values.

Couldn't you just save yourself a lot of time and just answer the question instead?
 
Office_Shredder said:
But...



Couldn't you just save yourself a lot of time and just answer the question instead?

Yeah I know, just wanted to further my knowledge :approve:
 
t_n_p said:
Well I do know f"(x)>0 represents concave up and f"(x)<0 represents concave down, but how can I get f"(x) (i.e. the derivative of g)

P.S. are my intervals for increasing g(x) correct?
Yes, your intervals look good to me. You don't need to get f''(x), you only need f'(x). Since g''(x) = f'(x), he gradient of f(x) on your plot represents the second derivative of g(x). Does that make sense?
 
Last edited:
Hootenanny said:
Yes, your intervals look good to me. You don't need to get f''(x), you only need f'(x); since g''(x) = f'(x), so the gradient of f(x) on your plot represents the second derivative of g(x). Does that make sense?

So g(x) is concave up for positive gradients of f(x), that is (3,4) and concave down for negative gradients of f(x), that is (1,2) and (4,6).
 
  • #10
t_n_p said:
So g(x) is concave up for positive gradients of f(x), that is (3,4) and concave down for negative gradients of f(x), that is (1,2) and (4,6).
Looks good to me :approve:
 
  • #11
Finally, points of inflexion on the graph of g occur when there are turning points on the graph of f, that is when x=4.

I now need to use all this info and the fundamental theorem of calculus to find values of g(x) at appropriate points to draw g(x). I suppose this is where the y-coordinates come in handy! I'll be back later with my attempted graph!
 
  • #12
I've got a rough idea of what it looks like already, but with the graph being concave down for (1,2) and concave up for (3,4), what's happening between the interval of (2,3)?

Also how would I go about finding the y value for x=4?
will it be the y value at x=3.5 plus the area of the small triangle, i.e.
0.75+(0.5X0.5X1)?
 
  • #13
t_n_p said:
I've got a rough idea of what it looks like already, but with the graph being concave down for (1,2) and concave up for (3,4), what's happening between the interval of (2,3)?
Well, the second derivative test is inconclusive. However, you can say that g'(x)=-1 for {x : 2 < x < 3}, therefore the slope at this point is constant and the graph is a straight line y = -x.
t_n_p said:
Also how would I go about finding the y value for x=4?
will it be the y value at x=3.5 plus the area of the small triangle, i.e.
0.75+(0.5X0.5X1)?
I haven't checked your numbers, but you method is correct :approve:
 
  • #14
http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/6467/asdfra4.jpg

think i got it right:cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K