I was trying to prove the derivatives of the inverse trig functions, but I ran into a problem when I tried doing it with arcsecant and arccosecant.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So the general process is this:

y = arcsec(x)

sec(y) = x

dy/dx * sec(y)tan(y) = 1

dy/dx = 1/[sex(y)tan(y)]

sec(y) = x

And for tan(y) we use the Pythagorean identities:

tan^2(y) = sec^2(y) - 1

tan(y) = [sec^(y) - 1] ^(1/2)

So dy/dx = 1/[x(x^2-1)^(1/2)]

However, my calculus book has one minor difference in it's derivative, an absolute value:

dy/dx = 1/[abs(x)(x^2-1)^(1/2)]

Where does this absolute value come from?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivative of arcsec(x) and arccsc(x)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Derivative arcsec arccsc | Date |
---|---|

I Derivative and Parameterisation of a Contour Integral | Feb 7, 2018 |

I Why does this concavity function not work for this polar fun | Jan 26, 2018 |

I Euler Lagrange formula with higher derivatives | Jan 24, 2018 |

I Derivative of infinitesimal value | Jan 15, 2018 |

Indefinite integral of arcsec(x) | May 14, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**