High School Derivative of the Lorentz factor

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the time-derivative of the Lorentz factor and the expression for four-acceleration. David Morin's formulation states that the time-derivative of the Lorentz factor is given by ##\dot{\gamma} = \gamma^3 v \dot{v}##, which raises questions about its accuracy. An alternative interpretation suggests that it should be expressed as ##\dot{\gamma} = \gamma^3 (\mathbf{v} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{v}})##, emphasizing the vector nature of velocity. The distinction is made that while ##v^2## represents the magnitude squared of velocity, it can also be expressed as ##\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{v}##, leading to a clarification of the relationship between ##v \dot{v}## and ##\mathbf{v} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{v}}##. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the nuances in the mathematical representation of relativistic dynamics.
SiennaTheGr8
Messages
512
Reaction score
207
According to David Morin (link: https://books.google.com/books?id=Ni6CD7K2X4MC&pg=PA636), the time-derivative of the Lorentz factor is (##c=1##):

##\dot{\gamma} = \gamma^3 v \dot{v}##,

and the four-acceleration:

##\mathbf{A} = (\gamma^4 v \dot{v}, \gamma^4 v \dot{v} \mathbf{v} + \gamma^2 \mathbf{a})##.

Is that a mistake? I thought that it's:

##\dot{\gamma} = \gamma^3 (\mathbf{v} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{v}})##,

and

##\mathbf{A} = (\gamma^4 (\mathbf{v} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{v}}), \, \gamma^4 (\mathbf{v} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{v}}) \mathbf{v} + \gamma^2 \mathbf{a})##.I could be wrong, but my understanding is that the ##v^2## in the radicand is really ##\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{v}##, so that:

##\dfrac{d}{dt} \, (1 - v^2)^{-1/2} = \dfrac{d}{d(v^2)} \, (1 - v^2)^{-1/2} \, \dfrac{d}{dt} \, (\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{v})##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since ##v^2 = \vec v \cdot \vec v##, it follows directly that ##v \dot v = \vec v \cdot \dot{\vec v}##. However, note that ##\dot v## is generally not equal to ##|\dot{\vec v}|##.
 
  • Like
Likes SiennaTheGr8 and PeroK
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K