Derivative Proof: Prove f'(x)=lim x→0 (f(x+h)-f(x-h))/2h

  • Thread starter Thread starter v0id19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving that if the derivative f' is continuous, then the limit as x approaches 0 of (f(x+h) - f(x-h)) / 2h equals f'(x). Participants suggest manipulating the difference quotient and applying limit lemmas to reach the solution. The consensus is that the limit should be taken as h approaches 0, not x. The problem is identified as suitable for AP Calculus BC, and the use of L'Hospital's theorem is recommended for solving the limit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of derivatives and continuity in calculus
  • Familiarity with L'Hospital's theorem
  • Knowledge of limit definitions and properties
  • Experience with difference quotients in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition of continuity in calculus
  • Learn about limit lemmas and their applications
  • Practice problems involving L'Hospital's theorem
  • Explore the relationship between difference quotients and derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students in AP Calculus BC, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of derivative proofs and limit concepts.

v0id19
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if f' is continuous, show that:
\mathop{\lim}\limits_{x \to 0}(\frac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2h})=f'(x)
be sure to explain why f' must be continuous

Homework Equations


not really any equations, this is for AP Calc BC and we've just done L'Hospital's theorem and the derivatives/integrals of logs and inverse trig functions.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that as x-->0 it becomes \frac{f(h)-f(-h)}{2h} . I thought about proving that the difference quotient can be manipulated into the above formula, but haven't had any success.

Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you certain that it's supposed to be as x -> 0 and not h? Aside from that, my only suggestion is to add and subtract f(x)/2h and apply some limit lemmas.
 
yeah it says x-->0
what is a 'limit lemma'? o.O
 
I think jgens is right, it's likely h -> 0.

Hmmm, I'm surprised this is Calc BC. I think I've seen this problem in Spivak before.

The trick is to consider the difference quotient and replace h with -h, and then take the limit as h -> 0. Then you should be able to work with the expression given.

EDIT: Ok, this is a slightly different problem. Hmmm, see if you can make use of the definition of continuity, and the equivalence of the statements lim x -> a f(x) and lim h -> 0 f(a+h).
 
Last edited:
I think this approach may work:

Derivative of a function: y = f(x) than y - dy = f(x - h), hence dy/dx = lim h -> 0 (f(x) - f(x - h))/h

Given (f(x + h) - f(x - h))/2h = (f(x +h) - f(x) + f(x) - f(x - h))/2h. Take the limit as h -> 0 and I think that should yield a solution.

A limit lemma would be lim x-> c kf(x) = klim x -> c f(x) where k is a constant.
 
thanks i'll give that a try--my only question is how do i get it from x-->0 to h-->0?
 
So it turns out my math teacher actually did write the question wrong... it really is h-->0. it's solved with a simple l'hospital. thanks guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K