Derivatives and Differentials: Solving for \frac{dx^2}{dx}

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the expression \(\frac{dx^2}{dx}\) and its interpretation within the context of derivatives and differentials. Participants are exploring the correct application of derivative notation and its implications in a broader mathematical context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether \(\frac{dx^2}{dx}\) equals zero or \(2x\) and expresses confusion over the notation used. Other participants seek clarification on the original problem and the correct interpretation of derivative notation, suggesting that the expression might have been miswritten.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into derivative notation and questioning the assumptions behind the original problem. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of derivatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants are also discussing a related problem involving the 2D Laplace equation in polar coordinates, which introduces additional complexity and potential confusion regarding the treatment of terms like \(\rho^n\) in the context of differentiation.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Derivatives and differentials

Homework Statement


Hmm, when I have


[tex]\frac{dx^2}{dx}[/tex], does this equal zero or 2x?

What confuses me is the way it is written.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh ... what is the original problem? And did you copy that exactly?

1st derivative = [tex]\frac{d}{dx}[/tex]

2nd derivative = [tex]\frac{d^2}{dx^2}[/tex]

I think you meant ... [tex]\frac{d}{dx}(x^2)=2x[/tex] (which says ... this is the derivative of x ...) <--- just an example!

It's not like [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex] ... which states that you're taking the derivative of y with respects to x.
 
Last edited:
The original problem is:

Consider the 2D Laplace equation in polar cylindricals. Assume the solutions u(rho, Phi) = rho^n * Phi(phi), where n > 0.

I have to find u(rho, Phi).

What they do in the solution is to find the solution for Phi(phi) = A*cos(...) + B*sin(...), and then they set the total solution u(rho, Phi) = \sum [ A*cos(...) + B*sin(...) ] * rho^n.

So I got confused. They do not find the solution for rho^n, but they just multiply it on? That doesn't make sense since we have to take the deivate of rho in Laplace's eq. in 2D?
 
That's beyond me ... :p
 
Ok, but thanks for taking the time to look at it.

If anybody else has a suggestion, I am all ears.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K