Derivatives of Lagrangian Terms: Why We Lower?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of derivatives in Lagrangian mechanics, specifically concerning the lowering of indices using the metric and the implications of this process on the independence of variables. Participants explore the mathematical and conceptual foundations of these operations within the context of field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the reasoning behind lowering indices when taking derivatives of terms in the Lagrangian, suggesting that the derivatives might belong to different vector spaces.
  • Another participant asserts that the Lagrangian implicitly contains a metric, which relates vector spaces and dual spaces, and suggests using the chain rule for clarity.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that the independence of variations is crucial, noting that ##\partial^\mu\phi## and ##\partial_\mu\phi## are related through the metric and do not vary independently.
  • One participant proposes that considering the Lagrangian as a function of both ##\partial^\mu\phi## and ##\partial_\mu\phi## could yield additional derivatives in the Euler-Lagrange equations, although the end result would remain the same.
  • Another participant clarifies that ##\partial_{\nu} \phi## and ##\partial^{\nu} \phi## are components of vectors rather than elements of distinct vector spaces.
  • It is noted that partial derivatives do not act on vector fields without a connection, which adds another layer to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of derivatives and the implications of vector spaces and dual spaces in the context of Lagrangian mechanics. No consensus is reached, and multiple competing perspectives remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of properly handling variations and the relationships between different components in the context of the metric, but specific assumptions and definitions remain unresolved.

TroyElliott
Messages
58
Reaction score
3
In Lagrangians we often take derivatives (##\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}##) of terms like ##(\partial_{\nu}\phi \partial^{\nu}\phi)##. We lower the ##\partial^{\nu}## term with the metric and do the usual product rule. My question is why do we do this? Isn't ##\partial^{\nu}\phi## an element of a different vector space? I would think that ##\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}## is really just shorthand for a tensor product of operators, with one being an identity operator in the ##\partial^{\nu}## space. Can anyone explain why this isn't the correct way of looking at doing such a derivative? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your Lagrangian also contains implicitly a metric, which is a mapping between vector spaces and dual spaces. Write it out in full and use the chain rule :)

I don't get your "I would think"-remark, though.
 
Mmm, perhaps I didn't get your question.
 
It is not a question of what vector spaces things belong to. It is a question about what things you can vary independently. Due to ##\partial^\mu\phi## being directly related to ##\partial_\mu\phi## through the metric, they do not vary independently (and neither does ##\phi##, that is why you have a term ##\partial/\partial\phi##.

Now, you could consider the Lagrangian as a function of ##\partial^\mu\phi## and ##\partial_\mu\phi## and obtain an extra derivative in your EL equations. The end result would be the same anyway so it is typically simpler to lower (or raise) all indices and work from there.
 
haushofer said:
Well, your Lagrangian also contains implicitly a metric, which is a mapping between vector spaces and dual spaces. Write it out in full and use the chain rule :)

I don't get your "I would think"-remark, though.

I was trying to say that if ##\partial_{\nu}\phi## is in some vector space and ##\partial^{\nu}\phi## is located in a different vector space, both connected through a linear map ##g^{\mu \nu}##, I would think that we would have to explicitly choose the vector space that our operator ##\partial_{\nu}## is acting on i.e. either the original vector space or the dual space.
 
##\partial_{\nu} \phi## and ##\partial^{\nu} \phi## are not in a vector space, they are components of vectors (or more precisely vector fields).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TroyElliott
Also, the partial derivatives do not act on vector fields. You generally need a connection for that.

Regardless, I think the issue has been properly addressed by the first few posts.

TroyElliott said:
I was trying to say that if ##\partial_{\nu}\phi## is in some vector space and ##\partial^{\nu}\phi## is located in a different vector space, both connected through a linear map ##g^{\mu \nu}##, I would think that we would have to explicitly choose the vector space that our operator ##\partial_{\nu}## is acting on i.e. either the original vector space or the dual space.
See #4. It does not matter if you pick one or use both as long as you do your variation properly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TroyElliott

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
712
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K