Derive Acoustic Pressure Relation from Ideal Gass Law

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 4K views
dimensionless
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Derive [tex]p(r) = \frac{A}{r}e^{j(\omega t - kr)}[/tex] from [tex]pV = nRT[/tex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


From ideal gas law I have

[tex]p(r) = \frac{nRT}{V}[/tex]

R and T are constant, so I can pull them out now and replace them with A. If V is the volume of a spherical shell of thickness dr, I get

[tex]p(r) = \frac{n A}{4 \pi r^{2} dr}[/tex]

This means that the only thing that changes is the net flow of mass flowing into and out of my spherical shell. Which lead to

[tex]p(r) = \frac{A cos(\omega t - k r)}{4 \pi r^{2} dr}[/tex]

Putting this in exponential form I get

[tex]p(r) = \frac{A}{4 \pi r^{2} dr} e^{j(\omega t - k r)}[/tex]

Because the atoms are only moving radially, I can ignore the dr part. This leads to

[tex]p(r) = \frac{A}{4 \pi r^{2}} e^{j(\omega t - k r)}[/tex]

...I'm still stuck with an [tex]r^{2}[/tex] in the denominator instead of just [tex]r[/tex]. I think I did something wrong somewhere. I'm not sure where. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
Which lead to

[tex]p(r) = \frac{A cos(\omega t - k r)}{4 \pi r^{2} dr}[/tex]

Putting this in exponential form I get

[tex]p(r) = \frac{A}{4 \pi r^{2} dr} e^{j(\omega t - k r)}[/tex]

Not sure I see how this is done. The Euler relations are

[tex] \cos[x]=\frac{1}{2}\left(\exp[ix]+\exp[-ix]\right)[/tex]

dimensionless said:
Because the atoms are only moving radially, I can ignore the dr part. This leads to

[tex]p(r) = \frac{A}{4 \pi r^{2}} e^{j(\omega t - k r)}[/tex]

...I'm still stuck with an [tex]r^{2}[/tex] in the denominator instead of just [tex]r[/tex]. I think I did something wrong somewhere. I'm not sure where. Any help is appreciated.

Can you clarify why you ignore [itex]dr[/itex]?
 
I know that the Euler relation is

[tex] <br /> \cos[x]=\frac{1}{2}\left(\exp[ix]+\exp[-ix]\right)<br /> [/tex]

but quite I'm sure I've seen the expression

[tex] \exp[ix] = \cos[x] + i \sin[x][/tex]

used in many places but ignoring the imaginary part so that it just becomes

[tex] \exp[ix] = \cos[x] [/tex]

Actually, it really bothers me, but I've seen it in so many places.

I'm ignoring dr, in part because I'm seeking a particular result. As for rational, the particles are moving only as part of a sound wave, so they move parallel to dr. The pressure is force per unit area, and the area is perpendicular to dr...in other words, I need the pressure on a spherical surface rather than in a volume ( p(r) is net air pressure above the equilibrium).
 
dimensionless said:
I know that the Euler relation is

[tex] <br /> \cos[x]=\frac{1}{2}\left(\exp[ix]+\exp[-ix]\right)<br /> [/tex]

but quite I'm sure I've seen the expression

[tex] \exp[ix] = \cos[x] + i \sin[x][/tex]

used in many places but ignoring the imaginary part so that it just becomes

[tex] \exp[ix] = \cos[x] [/tex]

Actually, it really bothers me, but I've seen it in so many places.

This is true, and I didn't quite think of this part, mostly because the relation actually is

[tex] \Re\left[\exp[ix]\right]=\cos[x][/tex]

That is, the real component of the exponential is the cosine term, while the imaginary, [itex]\Im[/itex], is sine.

I'm ignoring dr, in part because I'm seeking a particular result. As for rational, the particles are moving only as part of a sound wave, so they move parallel to dr. The pressure is force per unit area, and the area is perpendicular to dr...in other words, I need the pressure on a spherical surface rather than in a volume ( p(r) is net air pressure above the equilibrium).

The pressure does apply itself parallel to the radial component, not perpendicular--draw yourself a picture of a spherical wave, you'll see ;)

I think, rather than using volume, you should consider the density:

[tex] P=\frac{nkT}{V}=\frac{nkT}{m}\rho[/tex]

Then consider how the density [itex]\rho[/itex] would change with a wave. It is possible that you will actually want to integrate, rather than just ignore the infinitesimal radial projection.
 


I think it might be simpler if I defined density [tex]n/V[/tex], so that

[tex]P=\frac{n}{V} kT= \rho kT[/tex]

which leads to

[tex]\rho = \frac{n}{4 \pi r^{2} dr}[/tex]

Since the number of mols varies with time, I get

[tex]\rho \cos(\omega t)= \frac{n \cos(\omega t)}{4 \pi r^{2} dr}[/tex]

Conversely, I could hold the volume constant and let the number of mols (or the mass) per unit volume vary so that I get

[tex]\rho = \frac{n}{r^{2} V}[/tex]

At the moment though, I'm still stuck.
 
Last edited:
I also have

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m v_{average}^{2} = \frac{3}{2}kT = \frac{3}{2}\frac{R}{n}T[/tex]

this leads to

[tex]v = \sqrt{3 \frac{RT}{nm} }[/tex]

and

[tex]T = \frac{n v^{2}}{3mR}[/tex]

where m is the mass of a particle and v is the velocity. I also have

[tex]F = \frac{dp}{dt}[/tex]

Where p=mv is the momentum. I still can't derive this equation though.