Deriving a Hamiltonian from dimensionless equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thrillhouse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving Hamiltonian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the Hamiltonian for an aeroelastic system using dimensionless equations of motion. The user, Thrillhouse, outlines a process involving the formulation of the Lagrangian, determination of canonical momentum, and application of a Legendre transform. A key point raised is whether it is acceptable to derive the Hamiltonian from dimensionless equations, with responses indicating that using "undimensionalised" equations is preferable to ensure accurate representation of total energy in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Knowledge of Legendre transforms
  • Concept of dimensionless equations in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hamiltonians from Lagrangians in classical mechanics
  • Research the implications of dimensionless equations in dynamical systems
  • Explore the relationship between energy conservation and Hamiltonian formulations
  • Learn about canonical momentum and its role in Hamiltonian mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in physics and engineering, particularly those focused on dynamical systems, aeroelasticity, and advanced mechanics.

thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

(As I mentioned in my previous post) I am trying to derive the Hamiltonian for a aeroelastic system, where the dynamical equations of motion (determined by Newtonian Mechanics) are known.

My process has been to
1. "guess" a form of the Lagrangian, check that it recreates the equations of motion
2. determine the canonical momentum
3. Perform a Legendre transform from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian

I've been thinking recently though, that the equations of motion are in dimensionless form (i.e. the equations have been appropriately scaled so that they are unitless). My question is:
Is it acceptable to derive the Hamiltonian from the dimensionless equations of motion, or do I have to use the "undimensionalised" equations of motion ? -

My rationale for this question is that the Hamiltonian does have to give me the total energy of the system - and I'm not sure that working from dimensionless equations will give me that ...

Cheers,
Thrillhouse
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Thrillhouse,

It sounds like you're on the right track and have done a lot of work already. I think it is better to use the "undimensionalised" equations of motion when deriving the Hamiltonian, as that will give you the total energy of the system. The dimensionless equations might not provide the correct results. Good luck with your research!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K