Deriving Covariance between S and N: E(SN) - ìXìN

johnnytzf
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
consider the following model for aggregate claim amounts S:
S=X1+X2+...+XN
where the Xi are independent, identically distributed random
variables representing individual claim amounts and N is a random
variable,independent of the Xi and representing the number of
claims.let X has ìx and let N has mean ìN and variance ó²N.

a) show that E(SN)=ìX ( ì²N + ó²N ) by considering expected values
conditional on the value of N

b) hence derive an expression for the covariance between S and N.



I know that

E(S) = E(E(S|N)) = E(N)E(S) = ìXìN,
Var(E(S|N)) = Var(N)Var(S) = ó²Xó²N

but how to link it with E(SN)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's make the question more readable. (See post #3 in the thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=617567)

Is it this?:

Consider the following model for aggregate claim amounts S
S=X_1+X_2+...+X_N
where the X_i are independent, identically distributed random
variables representing individual claim amounts and N is a random
variable,independent of the X_i and representing the number of
claims. let the mean of X_i be \mu_X and let the mean of N be \mu_N. Let the variance of N be \sigma^2_N. .

a) show that E(NS)=\mu_X ( \mu^2_N + \sigma^2_N ) by considering expected values
conditional on the value of N

b) hence derive an expression for the covariance between S and N.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top