Deriving equation of a ramp function graph.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for a ramp function graph, specifically focusing on the function f(t) and its representation using piecewise definitions and unit step functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formulation of f(t) and question whether their approaches are correct. There is a discussion about the necessity of using piecewise definitions or unit step functions to accurately represent the function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the unit step function to express f(t) more effectively. There is ongoing exploration of different formulations, with participants checking their progress against suggested methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the function is not simply linear, prompting discussions about the appropriate mathematical representation.

btbam91
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hello, here is my problem.

http://imageshack.us/a/img543/827/rampfunction.png

I'm having a little trouble coming up with the function f(t).

I have something like:

f(t) = [(A/T)*t -A] + [(A/T)*(t-2T) -2A] + A*1(t-3T)

Am I on the right track here?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
btbam91 said:
f(t) = [(A/T)*t -A] + [(A/T)*(t-2T) -2A] + A*1(t-3T)
This is still a linear equation in t, so it can't be right: the graph of any linear function is just a straight line. You will have to use a piecewise definition or perhaps a formula that incorporates unit step functions.
 
Have you studied the unit step function ##u(t)##? Expressing your function with it is the best way if you plan to transform the result. For example, if you want your function to equal g(t) on (0,a) and h(t) on (a,b) and 0 elsewhere you would write it like this:$$
f(t) = g(t)u(t) + (h(t) - g(t))u(t-a) + u(t-b)(0-h(t))$$Notice at each term you take out the old formula and put in the new one.
 
Thanks for the guidance! I will try to come up with a solution now with this additional knowledge!
 
LCKurtz, in trying to follow your formula, I got:

f(t) = [(A/T)*t - A]*u(t) + [((A/T)*t-3A)-((A/T)*t-A)]*u(t-2T)+[(0)-((A/T)*t-3A)]*u(t-3T)

Am I on the right track here?
 
btbam91 said:
LCKurtz, in trying to follow your formula, I got:

f(t) = [(A/T)*t - A]*u(t) + [((A/T)*t-3A)-((A/T)*t-A)]*u(t-2T)+[(0)-((A/T)*t-3A)]*u(t-3T)

Am I on the right track here?

That looks OK.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K