Deriving Fermi-Dirac Distribution misunderstanding

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the derivation of the Fermi-Dirac distribution, specifically when relating the partition functions Zs(N-1) and Zs(N) using Taylor expansion. The user attempts to apply the Taylor series method but struggles with the interpretation of variables and the truncation of terms. Key equations mentioned include Zs=e^{ln(Zs)} and the relationship e^{a+b}=e^a e^b. The main focus is on clarifying the function used in the Taylor expansion and the definitions of x and a.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions in mathematical physics.
  • Knowledge of partition functions in thermodynamics.
  • Basic proficiency in exponential functions and logarithmic identities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bose-Einstein distribution for a clearer comparison with Fermi-Dirac statistics.
  • Review Taylor series applications in statistical mechanics to solidify understanding of function expansions.
  • Explore the concept of partition functions in greater depth, focusing on their role in quantum statistics.
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of exponential and logarithmic functions relevant to statistical mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics and quantum statistics, will benefit from this discussion. It is especially relevant for those tackling problems related to Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions.

d2699
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The actual question was deriving Bose-Einstein, but I got confused on the F-D example. I'm basically following the method given here.

Homework Equations


[All taken directly from the above link]
img1389.png

img1393.png

img1396.png


Taylor series:
NumberedEquation1.gif


The Attempt at a Solution


So after that third equation is where I can't figure it out. To relate Zs(N-1) to Zs(N), we Taylor expand Zs(N-ΔN) to get:

img1401.png

where
img1402.png


Looking specifically at that middle step, I figured the terms after the second term were truncated. I don't understand what is being used as the function, what are x and a, etc. Can someone point me in the right direction?
 

Attachments

  • img1389.png
    img1389.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 456
  • img1393.png
    img1393.png
    1,005 bytes · Views: 485
  • img1396.png
    img1396.png
    940 bytes · Views: 486
  • NumberedEquation1.gif
    NumberedEquation1.gif
    3.3 KB · Views: 489
  • img1401.png
    img1401.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 494
  • img1402.png
    img1402.png
    550 bytes · Views: 475
Physics news on Phys.org
## x=N-\Delta N ##, and ## a=N ##. They also take ## Z_s=e^{ln(Z_s)} ##, and let ## \Delta N=1 ##. And also ## e^{a+b}=e^a e^b ##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K