Graduate Deriving matrix element from Lagrangian

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the matrix element for the W+W- to W+W- scattering process from the quartic term in the electroweak boson self-interactions Lagrangian. The matrix element is expressed as a function of the polarization vectors and involves a specific symmetrization of the coefficients in the Lagrangian. The correct symmetrization leads to the factor of (2ημσηνρ - ημνηρσ - ημρηνσ) in the matrix element. The participants emphasize the importance of symmetrizing the Lagrangian terms to obtain the appropriate Feynman rules. This process is crucial for accurate calculations in particle physics.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the following tree-level Feynman diagrams for the ##W^{+}W^{-} \to W^{+}W^{-}## scattering process.

94a15c798a.png


The matrix element for this diagram can be read off from the associated quartic term ##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}## in the electroweak boson self-interactions, where

##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW} = -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left[ (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{-\mu})^{2} - (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{+\mu})(W_{\nu}^{-}W^{-\nu}) \right]##

##= -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma}\right)W^{+\mu}W^{-\nu}W^{+\rho}W^{-\sigma}.##

Why does this mean that the matrix element is

##\mathcal{M} = -g_{2}^{2}(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})\epsilon^{\mu}(p_{1})\epsilon^{\nu}(p_{2})\epsilon^{\rho}(k_{1})\epsilon^{\sigma}(k_{2})?##

More specifically, I am not able to derive the factor of ##(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})## in the matrix element.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should symmetrize the coefficient in the Lagrangian. Here it's to be symmetrized in ##\mu \nu## and ##\rho \sigma##, i.e., you have
$$\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}=
-\frac{1}{4}g^{2}_{2} \left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}+\eta_{\rho \nu} \eta_{\mu \sigma}-2\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma}\right)W^{+\mu}W^{-\nu}W^{+\rho}W^{-\sigma}.$$
Now the coefficient in front of the fields leads directly to the Feynman rule.
 
  • Like
Likes spaghetti3451
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K