Deriving the continuity equation from the Dirac equation (Relativistic Quantum)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the continuity equation from the Dirac equation in the context of relativistic quantum mechanics. The original poster attempts to manipulate the Dirac equation and its Hermitian adjoint to arrive at the desired equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of multiplying the Dirac equation and its adjoint by the wave functions in different orders. There are questions about the application of the product rule and the implications of matrix dimensions on the derivation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the multiplication order, and the original poster has identified an error in their approach that led to confusion. The discussion reflects a productive exploration of the problem, with attempts to clarify the correct method.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential errors in lecture notes regarding the multiplication of functions, which may have contributed to the original poster's misunderstanding. The dimensionality of the matrices involved is also a point of consideration in the discussion.

toam
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
So I am trying to derive the continuity equation:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}J^{\mu} = 0[/tex]

From the Dirac equation:

[tex]i\gamma^{\mu} \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}\Psi - \mu\Psi = 0[/tex]

And its Hermitian adjoint:

[tex]i\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}\overline{\Psi}\gamma^{\mu} - \mu\overline{\Psi} = 0[/tex]

Where:

[tex]\overline{\Psi}=\Psi^{+}\gamma^{0}[/tex] (Dirac conjugate)



The Attempt at a Solution


By multiplying the Dirac equation on the right by [tex]\overline{\Psi}[/tex] and the adjoint on the right by [tex]\Psi[/tex] I get:

[tex]i(\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}(\gamma^{\mu}\Psi)\overline{\Psi} + \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}(\overline{\Psi})\gamma^{\mu}\Psi) - \mu(\Psi\overline{\Psi} - \overline{\Psi}\Psi)=0[/tex]

The first term is basically what I am after (except I am not 100% sure I can simply apply the product rule - what is the correct order?) which means I shoudl expect the second term to go to zero:

[tex]\Psi\overline{\Psi} - \overline{\Psi}\Psi =0[/tex]

But because [tex]\gamma^{0}[/tex] is a 4x4 matrix, [tex]\Psi[/tex] is a 4x1 and [tex]\overline{\Psi}[/tex] is a 1x4, I should also expect the second term to be multiplied by the 4x4 identity matrix (so that the subtraction makes sense). However the first term is NOT a constant multiplied by the identity so I don't see how this works.



Any help would be greatly appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
toam said:
By multiplying the Dirac equation on the right by [tex]\overline{\Psi}[/tex] and the adjoint on the right by [tex]\Psi[/tex] …

Hi toam! :smile:

Don't you have to multiply one of them on the left? :confused:
 
I tried that and got something else that didn't work. However I will try again because I was surprised that it didn't work so I may have made a mistake or missed something obvious...
 
Ok so it turned out I had multiplied the wrong function on the left. It worked out quite simply when I fixed that. The lecture notes had erroneously shown both functions multiplied on the right.

Thanks, tiny-tim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K