Deriving the Dirac propagator 'purely' from causality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Dirac propagator using causality principles, specifically emphasizing the causal nature of the Green's function. The Heaviside step function is utilized to express the propagator, leading to a convolution in momentum space defined by the Hilbert transform. The final form of the propagator is presented as {\cal D}(E,p) = (E + \vec{\alpha} \cdot \vec{p} + \beta m) / (E^2 - p^2 - m^2), establishing a clear connection between energy, momentum, and mass in quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Heaviside step function
  • Knowledge of Hilbert transforms and their properties
  • Basic concepts of quantum field theory, particularly the Dirac equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Green's functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the application of the Heaviside step function in physics
  • Explore Hilbert transforms and their role in signal processing
  • Investigate the Dirac equation and its implications in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as students and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Hans de Vries
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
31
I figured out this one, just thought it was quite nice...
We start with the only requirement that the Green's function of the propagator is causal in the sense that it propagates stricktly forward in time, so that the Green's function is zero at [itex]t<0[/itex]. Using the Heaviside step function we can express this as follows.

[tex] {\cal D}(r,t)\ =\ {\cal D}(r,t)\ \theta(t) [/tex]A multiplication with the Heaviside function amounts to a convolution with it's Fourier transform in momentum space

[tex] {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ =\ {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ * \ \frac{1}{2}\left(\delta(\omega)-\frac{i}{\pi \omega}\right)[/tex]

The convolution with the delta gives us the function itself, while the convolution with [itex]1/\omega[/itex] is a standard transformation known as the Hilbert transform. This transformation and its inverse are defined by:

[tex] {\cal H}\left\{\ \textit{f}\ (\omega)\ \right\}\ = -\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\eta-\omega}\ \textit{f}\ (\omega)\ d\eta<br /> \qquad \mbox{and} \quad<br /> {\cal H}^{-1} = -{\cal H}[/tex]

This allows us to write for the propagator in momentum space.

[tex] {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ =\ \frac{1}{2}\left(\ {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ +\ i {\cal H}\left\{\ {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ \right\}\ \right)[/tex]

From the right hand side we see that the propagator can be expressed as a complex sum of a function and its own Hilbert transform. The two halves together form a so-called Hilbert pair. The closest we find in terms of the usual propagators involving the d'Alembertian is: (From Stephan L. Hahn's book on the Hilbert transform)

[tex] \frac{a}{\omega^2-a^2} \quad <br /> \begin{array}{c} {\cal H}_\omega \\ \mbox{\Large $\Leftrightarrow$} \end{array}<br /> \quad -\frac{i\omega}{\omega^2-a^2}[/tex]

We already know what the denominators should be, but what about the numerators? Especially the factor [itex]a[/itex] which should be the square root of [itex]a^2[/itex]. Well, of course somebody already solved this almost 80 years ago. So,[tex] \mbox{using:}\ \ \ \left\{ <br /> \begin{array}{lcl}<br /> \omega^2 & \Rightarrow & E^2 \\ <br /> a^2 & \Rightarrow & p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2 + m^2 \\<br /> \omega & \Rightarrow & E,\ \ \mbox{or better:}\ \ \sqrt{I}\ E \\<br /> a & \Rightarrow & \alpha_1 p_x + \alpha_2 p_x + \alpha_3 p_x + \beta m<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.[/tex]We can now write down for our propagator:

[tex] {\cal D}(E,p)\ =\ \frac{E+\vec{\alpha}\cdot\vec{p}+\beta m}{E^2-p^2-m^2} [/tex]Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K