Deriving the Shortest Path in Radial Co-ordinates Using Variational Principle

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the shortest path in radial coordinates using the variational principle. The length of a curve is expressed as L = ∫(θ1 to θ2) √(r'^2 + r^2) dθ, with the functional defined as f = √(r'^2 + r^2). The user encounters difficulties with a nonlinear second-order differential equation while attempting to apply the variational principle. A suggestion is made to derive the equation for a line in polar coordinates, demonstrating that straight lines satisfy the derived conditions. The user successfully resolves the problem and offers to share their findings with others interested in the solution.
No Name Required
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I have this question,

Express the length of a given curve r = r(\theta) in radial co-ordinates. Using the Variational principle derive the shortest path between two points is a line.

Ive drawn a picture with two angles (measured from the x-axis) \theta_1 and \theta_2 so that r(\theta_1) = r_1 and r(\theta_2) = r_2.

I found the legth of the infinitesimal dl to be

dl = \sqrt{r'^2 + r^2} \; d\theta so that

\displaystyle{L = \int^{\theta_2}_{\theta_1} \sqrt{r'^2 + r^2} \; d\theta}

So my functional is f = \sqrt{r'^2 + r^2}

I have calculated \displaystyle{\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} = \frac{r}{\sqrt{r^2 + r'^2}}} and \displaystyle{\frac{\partiall f}{\partial r'} = \frac{r'}{\sqrt{r^2 + r'^2}}}

Also \displaystyle{\frac{\partial f}{\partial \theta} = 0}

I have tried setting up

\displaystyle{\frac{d}{d\theta} \frac{\partial f}{\partial r'} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} = 0} but this is leading to a nasty nonlinear second order differential equation which i presume is not correct.

I know that \theta is cyclic so a conservation law exists but I am not sure how to go about using this.

If someone could give me a plan of how to do the next couple of steps it would be great.

Thankyou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the equation you should obtain from varying the path length is
<br /> \frac{d}{d\theta}\left(\frac{r&#039;}{f}\right) = \frac{r}{f},<br />
where f(r,r&#039;) = \sqrt{r^2 + r&#039;^2}. First, let me note that a circle (r constant) does not satisfy this equation. You should expect this since the arc of a circle is not the shortest distance between two points. Second, you should probably write out the equation for a line in polar coordinates. It is kind of messy in general, but you could pick a representative type of line and show that it solves the equation. Once you know this, you can always rotate your coordinates to show that all other lines satisfy the differential equation too.

I worked it out myself so it can be definitely be done. Let me know if you have any more trouble.
 
Last edited:
In cartesian coordinates you have:
\int{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}dx}
\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} - \frac{d}{dx}\displaystyle{(}\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{y}}\displaystyle{)} = 0
... thus:
f = \sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}
\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = 0; \frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{y}} = \frac{\dot{y}}{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}}
\frac{d}{dx}\displaystyle{[}\frac{\dot{y}}{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}}\displaystyle{]} = 0
\frac{\ddot{y}}{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}^3} = 0
... thus:
\ddot{y} = 0
... and:
y = ax + b
 
Last edited:
Thankyou very much for your time and thoughts. I have solved the problem in polar co ordinates and if anyone is particularly interested i will write it up for them. I will check back tomorrow.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K