B Deriving v(t) from F(x), for Linear Motion

AI Thread Summary
To derive the velocity function v(t) from the force function F(x) = sqrt(x) * sin(x^2) for a 1 kg block on a frictionless surface, one must first express acceleration a in terms of force using Newton's second law, a = F/m. The relationship between acceleration, velocity, and position can be established using the chain rule, leading to the equation a = v * (dv/dx). By integrating this equation with respect to position x, one can find the velocity as a function of position, v(x). Finally, to obtain v(t), the relationship between position and time must be established, often requiring integration of the velocity function. This process illustrates the general method for deriving velocity from a given force function in kinematics.
silenteuphony
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Derive v(t) from F(x) = sqrt(x) * sin(x^2) for 1 kg block on level surface (or from F(x) in general if that function is too difficult)
Assuming I push a 1 kg block on a level surface, with no energy lost to friction, and I have an equation F(x) for force in terms of position, how would I derive an equation v(t) for velocity in terms of t? Specifically the function F(x) = sqrt(x) * sin(x^2), for 0 <= x <= sqrt(pi), if possible, but also just looking for the general procedure for any F(x).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top