Deriving Velocity Expression for Angular Impulse in Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter littleHilbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an expression for velocity in the context of angular impulse in polar coordinates. Participants are exploring the relationship between angular momentum and velocity, particularly focusing on the expression \(\dot{\vec{r}}=\dot{r}+\frac{l^2}{m^2r^2}\), where \(l\) represents angular impulse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the expression for velocity and its derivation, particularly the implications of setting \(\dot{\vec{r}}^2=\dot{r}^2\) and the conditions under which this equality holds. There is also a discussion about the units of the terms involved and the correct interpretation of angular momentum versus angular impulse.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections. Some have clarified the terminology used, while others are still grappling with the implications of their assumptions and the mathematical relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion between angular momentum and angular impulse, which has led to some misinterpretations of the expressions being discussed. Additionally, the use of polar coordinates is highlighted as a significant aspect of the problem.

littleHilbert
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!

I've got a question. How do we get this expression for the velocity:

[itex]\dot\vec{r}=\dot{r}+\frac{l^2}{m^2r^2}[/itex], where l is the angular impulse of force

I thought we could do it like this:
[itex]{\vec{l}}^2=l^2=(\vec{r}\times{m\dot\vec{r}})^2=m^2|\vec{r}|^2|\dot\vec{r}|^2-(\vec{r}\bullet{m\dot\vec{r}})^2=<br /> m^2r^2{\dot\vec{r}}^2-(\vec{r}\bullet{m{\dot\vec{r}})^2[/itex]
We can't simply write:[itex]{\dot\vec{r}}^2={\dot{r}}^2[/itex], since then l=0. But why? Which rule forbids that equality. Similarly we can't treat the scalar product above as we would wish to. So how should one proceed in this case?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
littleHilbert said:
Hey guys!

I've got a question. How do we get this expression for the velocity:

[itex]\dot\vec{r}=\dot{r}+\frac{l^2}{m^2r^2}[/itex], where l is the angular momentum
Where do you get this expression from? The units of [itex]L^2/m^2r^2[/itex] are [itex]m^2/sec^2[/tex] so this cannot be correct.<br /> <br /> It should be:<br /> <br /> [tex]\dot\vec{r}^2=\dot{r}^2+\left(\frac{l}{mr}\right)^2[/tex]<br /> <br /> AM[/itex]
 
Oh, Jesus sorry...I meant (anglular) impulse of force of course! :)...I've corrected it.
 
littleHilbert said:
We can't simply write: [itex]{\dot\vec{r}}^2={\dot{r}}^2[/itex], since then l=0. But why? Which rule forbids that equality.

[tex]\vec{r} = r\hat{r}[/tex]
[tex]\implies \dot \vec{r} = \frac{d}{dt} (r\hat{r}) = r\frac{d \hat{r}}{dt} + \frac{dr }{dt} \hat{r} = r \dot \theta \hat{\theta} + \dot r \hat{r}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Ahhh! Of course - polar coordinates! I've got it now!
Thanks guys! :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
922
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K