MHB Deriving Y-Component of Uniform Electric Rod | E=-▽V

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the y-component of the electric field from a uniform electric rod using the formula E = -▽V. The user calculated the derivative with respect to the vertical component "a" and arrived at the expression Κλl/(a sqrt(l^2+a^2)). Another participant confirmed the calculation but suggested that the constant appears unusual and provided an alternative expression for the y-component of the electric field: E_y = k_ell Q/(y sqrt(ell^2 + y^2)). The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles in deriving electric field components.
Quintessential
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is essentially the problem.

NDL0hSh.png


And this is what I did.

Realizing the following:

E = -▽V

I simply took the derivative in regards to the vertical component, in this case "a".

So:

-dV/da [the above formulae]

And I got the following:

Κλl/(a sqrt(l^2+a^2))

Does that seem about right?

**Sorry, I have no idea on how to operate the sexy mathjax characters.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Quintessential said:
This is essentially the problem.

NDL0hSh.png


And this is what I did.

Realizing the following:

E = -▽V

I simply took the derivative in regards to the vertical component, in this case "a".

So:

-dV/da [the above formulae]

And I got the following:

Κλl/(a sqrt(l^2+a^2))

Does that seem about right?

**Sorry, I have no idea on how to operate the sexy mathjax characters.

Welcome to MHB, Quintessential! :)

Yep. That seems about right, although your constant looks a bit weird.

Anyway, since they are asking for the y component of the electric field at point P, I would write:

$$E_y = \frac{k_\ell Q}{y \sqrt{\ell^2 + y^2}}$$

(If you click Reply With Quote, you can see what the mathjax looks like. ;))
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K