Desert island, how to find weight

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamBevan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight
AI Thread Summary
On a desert island, establishing a measurement system for mass, distance, and time can be approached using available resources. One could define a foot based on the length of their feet and use objects like rocks or coconuts as mass references. Time can be measured by observing the movement of shadows throughout the day. While these methods provide a basic framework, achieving precise measurements akin to modern standards may be unfeasible within a single lifetime. Ultimately, the accuracy desired will dictate the complexity of the measurement system developed.
iamBevan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
A friend asked me a question recently...

If you were washed up on a desert island - with nothing but yourself, and what the island offers (your standard desert island I guess) - how could you work out a system for mass, distance and time?

I've assumed that a system could easily be made - if you were to know your heart rate, height, and weight accurately - but that would you be your own system, relative to yourself only?

I want to know if there is a way to work out mass, distance and time, using the things we see around us - similar, or exactly as we measure it now? In the standardised sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, first it might be helpful to establish a measurment system that is easy to use from the available objects you have. You could simply say 1 foot is equal to the length of your feet! For mass you could start with something like a rock or coconut or whatever and use that as your basis. As for time you can measure the movement of shadow during the day and simply divide that into sections to determine the length of time. These won't be very accurate, but would be 1 way of starting out.

From there it takes more of a leap to get the standard measurements today. For one person, in one lifetim, I don't see it being possible to get "exactly" the measurements we currently use. But honestly it just depends on how accurate you want to be with the difference in the two measuring systems.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top