Designing Tuner: LRC Circuit w/377Ω Impedance @1MHz

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Designing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing an LRC circuit tuner with a specified input impedance of 377 Ω at 1 MHz and a bandwidth of 2%. Participants explore the implications of these specifications on the values of the inductor and capacitor, as well as the interpretation of bandwidth in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the bandwidth as B = R/L for a series RLC circuit and expresses confusion over the resulting inductor and capacitor values being impractically large and small, respectively.
  • Another participant points out that bandwidth should be expressed in frequency units rather than as a unitless percentage, prompting a reevaluation of how to interpret the 2% bandwidth at 1 MHz.
  • A later reply questions the necessity of a variable inductor in the design, suggesting that the calculations may not require it if the values are fixed.
  • Participants discuss whether bandwidth should be considered in terms of frequency or angular frequency, leading to clarification that B = R/L yields a value in radians per second.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of bandwidth and its implications for the circuit design. There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating the inductor and capacitor values based on the given specifications.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of bandwidth and its application in the context of the circuit design. The relationship between frequency and angular frequency in the calculations remains a point of contention.

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Using the circuit layout shown in Fig. 9-15 (Standard LRC circuit), design a tuner that uses a variable inductor, a capacitor, and a resistor. The input impedance of the tuner should be 377 Ω at 1 MHz an its bandwidth should be 2%.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


For this problem, I am assuming that a bandwidth of 2% means that B = .02. For an RLC circuit in series, B = R/L. Since the impedance is purely real at 1 MHz, and I know that 1 MHz is the resonant frequency, and I set it equal to 1/√LC. I choose R = 377 Ω, and the calculations that follow suit produce an inductor and capacitor value that doesn't sound right, the inductor is way too big and the capacitor is way too small. What is going on here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a table showing the circuit and equations

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1398755357.667059.jpg



And here is my attempt
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/69202
 

Attachments

  • 11.2 attempt 1.jpg
    11.2 attempt 1.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 482
Bandwidth has units of frequency, not a unitless value (like a percentage).

So, what might a 2% bandwidth imply for a frequency of 1MHz?
 
Thanks, how does this look? Still quite a small capacitor, but at least I know what letter to put in front of the F for this order of magnitude ;)


Assuming that this answer is correct, what was the point in specifying that the inductor was variable?

Edit: is Bandwidth the frequency or the angular frequency? Either B= .02*ω0, or B = .02*f?
 

Attachments

  • 11.2 attempt 2.jpg
    11.2 attempt 2.jpg
    27.2 KB · Views: 505
Last edited:
Okay, looking better. But the bandwidth B = R/L yields a value in radians per second, not Hz. You want to work with values of ω.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ok great, thank you! I changed it to omega, but the exact same procedure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K