Detecting induced electric fields in the ocean

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of detecting induced electric fields in ocean water due to the movement of ions in ocean currents through the Earth's magnetic field. Participants explore the feasibility of using simple measuring devices to detect these electric fields and consider potential applications, such as tsunami detection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the movement of ions in ocean water through the Earth's magnetic field would create an induced electric field, proposing a simple setup with a conducting wire and a sensitive voltmeter to detect it.
  • Another participant counters this idea, arguing that the presence of equal numbers of positive and negative ions in seawater would lead to cancellation of any induced electric field effects.
  • A third participant provides a detailed composition of seawater, noting that there are slightly more negative ions than positive, but later corrects this to indicate a small excess of positive ions.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the main salt in seawater, Sodium Chloride, dissociates into equal numbers of positive and negative ions, suggesting that this balance would negate significant electric fields.
  • One participant acknowledges the potential of measuring ionic motion for fluid dynamics but questions the viability of using this method for tsunami detection, citing the distinct characteristics of tsunami waves compared to normal ocean waves.
  • This participant also references existing tsunami warning systems that rely on pressure measurements rather than electric field detection, suggesting that the original idea may not be practical for this application.
  • Lastly, there is a suggestion that the concept of measuring ionic motion could have applications in biomedicine and neuroscience, where ionic movements are significant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of detecting induced electric fields in ocean water, with some supporting the idea and others providing counterarguments based on the composition of seawater. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practicality of using this method for tsunami detection.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of seawater composition and the implications for induced electric fields, noting that assumptions about ion balance and the nature of tsunami waves are critical to the discussion. There is also mention of existing technologies for tsunami detection that may not align with the proposed method.

royzizzle
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone:

Since there are many ions in ocean water, and these ions are carried by ocean currents, and they are moving through the Earth's magnetic field, by the electromagnetic induction laws, wouldn't there be a induced electric field in the ocean?

if i want to detect this electric field, would all i need be a piece of conducting wire connected to a very sensitive voltmeter and then place it in the ocean?

p.s: couldn't this be used as a very sensitive tsunami detector? when a tsunami wave passes through, there would be an increase int the speed of conductors.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No.

An interesting idea, but there are equal numbers of positive and negative ions in sea water, so any effects would cancel out.
 
here is the composition of seawater according to wikipedia:

Component Concentration (mol/kg)
H2O 53.6
Cl− 0.546
Na+ 0.469
Mg2+ 0.0528
SO2−
4 0.0282
Ca2+ 0.0103
K+ 0.0102
CT 0.00206
Br− 0.000844
BT 0.000416
Sr2+ 0.000091
F− 0.000068

from inspection, it can be seen that seawater has slightly more negative ions than positive.

edit: more positive than negative, but only a small amount: .00227moles/kg
 
Last edited:
The main salt in sea water is Sodium Chloride which dissociates as follows:

NaCl → Na + + Cl -

giving equal numbers of positive and negative ions.

The other salts do the same thing when they dissociate.

There may be more Cl - ions because more than one Chloride formed the original salt mixture.

The list doesn't give H + and OH - ions which would be considerable unless the seawater was completely neutral.
 
royzizzle, measuring fluid motions by monitoring the electric fields of ions in the fluid seems like a good idea. The charged particles do move through the earth’s magnetic field and, of course, they do obey induction laws. Using the basic laws of physics to create measuring devices is always a sure path to new and innovative ideas.

As for a tsunami detector, this mechanism probably would not be viable. If the sensitive voltmeter was immersed in the ocean to measure fluid motion it may be difficult or impossible to discriminate between normal ocean waves and a passing tsunami wave. Here are a few excerpts from the Wiki tsunami page:

“Tsunami waves do not resemble normal sea waves, because their wavelength is far longer. Rather than appearing as a breaking wave, a tsunami may instead initially resemble a rapidly rising tide, and for this reason they are often referred to as tidal waves. Tsunamis generally consist of a series of waves with periods ranging from minutes to hours, arriving in a so-called "wave train".[4]

Tsunamis have a small amplitude (wave height) offshore, and a very long wavelength (often hundreds of kilometers long, whereas normal ocean waves have a wavelength of only 30 or 40 metres),[22] which is why they generally pass unnoticed at sea, forming only a slight swell usually about 300 millimetres (12 in) above the normal sea surface. They grow in height when they reach shallower water, in a wave shoaling process described below. ”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsunami

Now, it may be useful to read up on how tsunami warning systems are now being implemented around the world. Basically, they measure the increase in pressure caused by the passing tsunami wave using sensors on the sea bottom. See:
http://www.tsunami.noaa.gov/warning_system_works.html
http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/Oceans99/index.html
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/dart/dart.shtml

Observation: Maybe your basic idea of measuring ionic motion would find useful applications in biomedicine where measuring blood and urine flows is important. And what about in neuroscience, where minute ionic charges are moving around our nervous systems and inside our brains? I hope you are keeping a notebook with your ideas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
717