Determening the Period of Coupled Oscillators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the period of motion for two or more coupled oscillators, focusing on the mathematical relationships between angular frequencies and periods, as well as the implications of rational versus irrational ratios of these frequencies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the method to determine the period of coupled oscillators given their state variable equations.
  • Another participant suggests transforming the equations of motion to obtain independent equations to find ω1 and ω2.
  • A later post seeks a general solution assuming ω1 and ω2 are known, questioning how to determine the period in this case.
  • It is proposed that ω1 and ω2 represent angular frequencies, which relate to periods T1 and T2, and that the repetition period exists if the ratio of these frequencies is rational.
  • One participant emphasizes that if the ratio of periods is rational, the repetition period corresponds to the least common multiple of T1 and T2.
  • Another participant raises the issue of finding a general solution for any oscillation, noting the harmonic repetition in coupled oscillations.
  • It is stated that if the ratio of the periods is not rational, there is no common period, leading to the concept of "incommensurable" periods.
  • One participant mentions that in practice, approximate periods may be observed due to measurement limitations and finite precision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of a general solution for the period of coupled oscillators, particularly regarding the implications of rational versus irrational frequency ratios. The discussion remains unresolved on this point.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the dependence on the rationality of the frequency ratios and the limitations of measurement precision in practical scenarios.

omertech
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I was wondering how could you determine the period of the motion of two or more coupled oscillators. For example, two oscillators have the state variable equations:
[tex]x_1=A_1\cos{(\omega_1t+\phi_1)}+A_2\cos{(\omega_2t+\phi_2)}[/tex]
[tex]x_2=A_1\cos{(\omega_1t+\phi_1)}-A_2\cos{(\omega_2t+\phi_2)}[/tex]
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on your setup. Do you have equations of motion for your oscillators?
Can you transform them to get two independent equations? Solve those, and you get ω1 and ω2
 
I want to have a general solution, so let's assume ω1 and ω1 are known, as well as all of the other quantities. How can you determine the period in such general case?
 
ω1 and ω2 ARE the periods.
You can re-write the sum as product of two oscillations, but that won't give you a single frequency either. With weak coupling, you get the product of a quick oscillation and a slow one (half of the sum and the difference of ω1 and ω2 iirc), where the slow one can be interpreted as amplitude modulation of the quick one.

If you want a repetition period: This exists if ω1 and ω2 have a rational ratio, and corresponds to the least common multiple of them.
 
Thanks for the answer. As far as I know ω1 and ω2 are the angular frequencies. They are related to the periods T1 and T2 by:
[tex]T_1=\frac{2\pi}{\omega_1}[/tex]
[tex]T_2=\frac{2\pi}{\omega_2}[/tex]

What I am looking for is indeed the repetition period. I know about the common multiple thing, but isn't there any general solution for any oscillation? Because I know that there is a harmonic repetition in coupled oscillations, the question is in what period?

Thanks again
 
Oh sorry, least common multiple of the corresponding Ti, of course.
I think I answered this in my previous post, so I have no idea what to add.
 
Yes your answer is suitable if the ratio between them is indeed rational. But this is not always the case. If it's not rational than would it be the product of T1 and T2? Or perhaps there is a smaller answer?
 
Mathematically, if the ratio of the periods is not rational, there is no common period.
No matter how many periods of the first one you take, you can never fit an integer number of periods of the second one. The two periods are "incommensurable".

In practice, you may find some approximate period.
You measure the time and the period with some finite precision so the motion will repeat after some time, within experimental error (or will look like it's repeating).
If the two modes go through a maximum within 10 ns and you measure time with 1 μs, you cannot tell that they did not do it simultaneously.
 
mfb and nasu thanks a lot of clarifying that
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K