jdstokes
- 520
- 1
Let B \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}.Show that \det e^B = e^{tr B} where tr B is the trace of of B.
Clearly e^{tr B} is the product of the diagonal entries of e^{B}.
By the Jordan canonical for theorem, \exists P,J \in \mathbb{C}^{n \times n} where P is invertible and J is a diagonal sum of Jordan blocks, such that
BP = PJ
P^{-1}BP = J
P^{-1}e^{B}P = e^{J}
e^{B} = Pe^{J}P^{-1}
\det e^{B} = \det P \det e^{J} \det P^{-1}
\det e^{B} = \det e^{J}
This is where I get stuck. Since e^{J} is upper triangular, its determinant is the product of its diagonal entries, but why should this be equal to the product of the diagonal entries of e^{B}?
Thanks
Clearly e^{tr B} is the product of the diagonal entries of e^{B}.
By the Jordan canonical for theorem, \exists P,J \in \mathbb{C}^{n \times n} where P is invertible and J is a diagonal sum of Jordan blocks, such that
BP = PJ
P^{-1}BP = J
P^{-1}e^{B}P = e^{J}
e^{B} = Pe^{J}P^{-1}
\det e^{B} = \det P \det e^{J} \det P^{-1}
\det e^{B} = \det e^{J}
This is where I get stuck. Since e^{J} is upper triangular, its determinant is the product of its diagonal entries, but why should this be equal to the product of the diagonal entries of e^{B}?
Thanks
Last edited: