Determinate the character of an improper integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the character of an improper integral, specifically the integral \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xe^{-x^2}dx\). Participants explore the convergence and evaluation of this integral, questioning the methods and reasoning involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of integrating the function and the use of the squeeze theorem. There are mentions of symmetry in the function's graph and its implications for convergence. Some participants suggest substitutions and explore the implications of symmetry on the integral's value.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches and questioning the assumptions made about the integral's convergence. There is no explicit consensus, but several lines of reasoning are being explored, including the use of symmetry and substitution methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion regarding the relationship between the symmetry of the function and the convergence of the improper integral. There is also mention of the Cauchy principal value and its distinction from the true integral.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30

Homework Statement


Hi. Well, the statement exhorts me to determinate the character of some improper integrals, and it begins with this one [tex]\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xe^{-x^2}dx[/tex]

I really don't know how to work this out. I think its not possible to integrate it, cause its not an elemental function. So I think I should use something, I know it converges to zero, cause I used mathematica to calculate it, but I don't know how to reason it, but maybe using something like the sandwich theorem for function, I mean squeezing it, knowing that integral is not bigger to some other one I could determinate its character. The other thing I thought watching at its graph was demonstrating that its symmetrical to the origin, so that's why it converges to zero. But I'm not sure.

Bye there. And thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is an elementary integral and you can find an indefinite integral. Do the u substitution u=x^2.
 
Ups. Thanks Dick.
 
Have you actually tried doing any of the things you suggested?

Edit: whoops, I'm too slow.
The other thing I thought watching at its graph was demonstrating that its symmetrical to the origin, so that's why it converges to zero. But I'm not sure.
I'm pretty sure this would be faster. If nothing else, trying to reason this out is good practice.
 
Maybe, but I don't know if I would realize of it if I wouldn't watched at the graph. I should buy a calculator that makes graphs :P
 
Symmetries are one of the kinds of things you should always be looking for -- when they exist, exploiting them often makes problems a lot simpler.

Substituting u = -x is one of the more common things to try. And the more experience you get just trying the substitution and seeing what happens, the better you'll be able to quickly identify when it will be useful (and maybe even spotting other substitutions, like u = 1-x).
 
Let's be a little careful here. Obviously, by symmetry, [itex]\int_{-a}^a xe^{-x^2}dx= 0[/itex] but that, by itself, does not imply that [itex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty xe^{-x^2}dx[/itex] is equal to 0 or even converges.

[tex]\lim_{\epsilon\to \infty}\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon xe^{-x^2}dx[/itex] <br /> is the "Cauchy principal value" and may exist even when the true integral:<br /> [tex]\lim_{\alpha\to\infty}\lim_{\beta\to -\inty}\int_\beta^\alpha xe^{-x^2} dx[/tex]<br /> does not.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K