Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Determination of past vs future probability

  1. Sep 14, 2006 #1
    How is estimating the probability that a future event might happen different from estimating the probability that a past event might have happened?
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 15, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I haven't taken a full fledged quantum class (that's next year for me),
    but I know that if I answer, someone will tell me I'm wrong and thus, answer your question, so I'll conjecture purely for your sake.... :blushing:

    There's two ways I can think of to look at this. If we look at it theoretically, like say, take a time-dependent schroedinger equation, that it should be exactly the same, just at a different time, t. In this case, you'd have two t's for your limit of integration, t future, and t past.

    I think, however, in reality, if an event has already occured, than the probability wave has already collapsed. The event has already occured, so there is no probability attached to it, just a definite.

    Unless of course, you haven't observed the event, than it still exists as a probability until you observe it.
  4. Sep 15, 2006 #3
    Both quantum mechanics (concerning microscopic probability) and general relativity (concerning macroscopic probability) are time symmetric. I would guess that excludes wavefunction collapse. Could wavefunction collapse ever occur in reverse?
  5. Sep 16, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Quantum mechanics, as the formalism is normally presented, has two kinds of development. The development of the wavefunction when not observed is smooth ("unitary", preserving probability measures). It is therefore reversable.

    The other development is the "collapse of the wavefunction" as a result of observation. This is NOT reversable or unitary. Some people are offended by the existence of this awkwardness, and would seek to eliminate it and have an all-unitary physics. To do this leads to the Everett many-worlds theory.
  6. Sep 16, 2006 #5


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Have you ever read "In search of Schroedinger's Cat" by Jon Gribbins?

    He supports the many-worlds theory. Interesting book.
  7. Sep 16, 2006 #6
    Could memory and prediction be processes time-reversed relative to each other?
  8. Sep 17, 2006 #7
    the many-worlds model is not the only time-symmetric attempt at an interpretation of QM (and not all many-worlds interpretations are necessarily time-symmetric). There are time-symmetric Bohmian models also. Here is just a couple of such papers :

    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0210/0210207.pdf#search=%22time%20symmetric%20bohmian%20mechanics%22 [Broken]


    and from a paper entitled "Arrows of Time in Bohmian Mechanics" by Shelly Goldstein and Roderich Tumulka :
    And in a time-symmetric deterministic interpretation, estimating probabilities of future events is essentially the same as estimating probabilities of past events - limited only by our epistemic perspective.

    Best Regards
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook