- #1
Lotic7
- 12
- 0
I recently purchased some 660nm LEDs. They look kind of orange not deep red. What is the easiest and cheapest way to determine the emission spectrum. Eventually I wanted to try to use the 660nm LEDs to grow some plants.
Check the datasheet for the LEDs -- it may have that information. Or else, maybe use a prism?Lotic7 said:I recently purchased some 660nm LEDs. They look kind of orange not deep red. What is the easiest and cheapest way to determine the emission spectrum. Eventually I wanted to try to use the 660nm LEDs to grow some plants.
Me too! I've been thinking about it for over a year now. [ref: PF]Lotic7 said:Eventually I wanted to try to use the 660nm LEDs to grow some plants
I just did this experiment. The RGB values are of no use, IMHO.Lotic7 said:I purchased the 660nm LEDs off amazon. There are no no manufacturer markings on them, but they work. I guess you get what you pay for. How well would a digital camera work in analyzing the spectrum? If a picture was taken of the lit LED or after the light from the LED was put through a prism and refracted. The RGB values of the individual pixels could be observed.
My camera is quite, um, "inexpensive", and only takes JPG images. But, I think it's a moot point.It would be interesting to see how accurate this would be. Would the image compression affect the RGB values (TIFF vs JPG)?
Lotic7 said:How well would a digital camera work in analyzing the spectrum?
Andy Resnick said:...
Edit: OmCheeto's link describes essentially what I did.
OmCheeto said:I was going to drop your name, as a known authority on the topic, but I thought it might be seen as a bit presumptuous.
Tom.G said:Save your money for a diffraction grating. A CD or DVD works fine.
Beings howAndy Resnick said:CD/DVD are not transmissive gratings and have curved 'slits', complicating everything. Transmission gratings are so cheap as to be nearly free:
http://www.hometrainingtools.com/di...e=2&fep=2082&gclid=CNTn4f-TissCFQEGaQodrpUIIw
We buy then by the case.
OmCheeto said:Beings howtodayyesterday was Sunday, and the store that sells diffraction grating was closed, I decided to try the CD approach.
I now can appreciate why there are "optical benches", as my data is somewhat boogered.
I'll try again in the morning.
View attachment 96274
OmCheeto said:While I'm collecting new data, I thought I'd share some notes, images, comments, retractions, excuses, and theories as to what the heck is going wrong.
Notes:
1. My camera is old and cheap. The only adjustment available is "focus", which consists of markings: "Flower"(1 ft), "Mountain"(∞), and a "4 feet" line, which I drew on with a sharpie pen one day...... big snip ...
2. When overloaded, my camera turns colors white.
OmCheeto said:While I'm collecting new data, I thought I'd share some notes, images, comments, retractions, excuses, and theories as to what the heck is going wrong.
<snip>
I don't just "like" this I love itOmCheeto said:Beings howtodayyesterday was Sunday, and the store that sells diffraction grating was closed, I decided to try the CD approach.
I now can appreciate why there are "optical benches", as my data is somewhat boogered.
I'll try again in the morning.
I decided that the flexibility of the cardboard box was one major problem.davenn said:outstanding effort considering the setup !
am impressedDave
R G B Notes
203 0 46 red laser
196 0 51 red laser
183 0 25 red led
165 0 9 red led
OmCheeto said:The data there was also screwy. I used my red laser pointer as a reference, and my camera thinks there is blue light coming out of it.
Andy Resnick said:I see this issue as well, when I illuminate with a strong monochromatic source. I think it's a combination of Bayer filter artifact and intensity, but I don't know for sure. Here's an example, a diffraction pattern from a 532 laser:
And the color line trace from the central peak outwards:
The red and blue channels get excited when the intensity is high.
OmCheeto said:Even the dimmest regions show blue.
Andy Resnick said:The red and blue channels get excited when the intensity is high.
Important application note: Don't let the magic smoke escape.Daz said:Coming back to the original post about LED colour, I’ve noticed (through error, rather than design) that if I overdrive an LED the emission blue-shifts and broadens. I once accidentally connected an LED display directly to the supply without a current-limiting resistor. The normally red display lit up brightly with an almost whitish-orange hue. Then started to smoke! Maybe that’s why the OP observed orange emission from a red LED?
OMG I've done this, a looonnng time ago, what bad could happen?Jeff Rosenbury said:Important application note: Don't let the magic smoke escape.
(I know from experience.)
Worst case? Dogs and cats living together. Fire , flood (well, if it's a dam controller). Destruction.jerromyjon said:OMG I've done this, what bad could happen?
Whew, as long as my dreams didn't go up in smoke from too many fried leds! The last one I fried was the best because the next one launched the rocket successfully. I used leds to make the switch that you had to push one direction on controller to arm it, then the other direction to launch, using a forward or turns in reverse wireless car chassis. I fired a D12-7 missile looking rocket but the fins didn't hold and those were the days.Jeff Rosenbury said:Worst case? Dogs and cats living together. Fire , flood (well, if it's a dam controller). Destruction.
OmCheeto said:I think my Bayer filter is broken.
Daz said:I too have seen this occur. It happens with CCD detectors where each pixel is essentially a potential well with a finite density of states. If the incident light intensity is high, the individual colour pixels saturate and charge starts spilling over into adjacent pixels. It’s called white-out and reducing the intensity should resolve it.
This is a pretty common Bayer pattern.Andy Resnick said:I don't understand the 'half pixel' appearance... I guess mine is broken as well :)
Andy Resnick said:This image was taken using brightfield reflection microscopy, but the light must be reflecting off the underlying pixels, not the filter, because the colors are correctly rendered.
Andy Resnick said:On the other hand, thin film filters only work over a restricted range of incident angle, so high-angle rays associated either with fast lenses or wide angle lenses would not be correctly filtered. I have never noticed such a thing, and have not heard anyone else noticing that.
Tom.G said:If the camera has "automatic white balance", turn it off!