Determine the period of the oscillations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that a weighted cylindrical rod floating in a fluid will undergo simple harmonic motion (SHM) when displaced from its equilibrium position. The key forces at play are the weight of the rod (mg) and the buoyant force, which varies with displacement. By establishing that the net force acting on the rod can be expressed as mg minus the buoyant force, it can be shown that this force is proportional to the negative of the displacement, leading to the equation F = -kx. This relationship confirms that the motion is harmonic, and from this, the period of oscillation can be derived using the formula T = 2π√(m/k). Ultimately, the analysis confirms that the rod will indeed execute SHM under the specified conditions.
physixnot4me
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1) A long cylindrical rod of radius, r is weighted on one end so that it floats upright in a fluid having a density. It is pushed down a distance x from its equilibrium position and released. Show that the rod will execute simple harmonic motion if the resistive effects of the fluid are negligible and determine the period of the oscillations>>

Start with the forces: mg and the "restoring" force, bouyancy. Bouyance is dependent on displacement.

mg- restoring force = mass*acceleration

where acceleration is d"x/dx".

BUT, how does that lead me to showing the rod will execute simple harmonic motion? and how do i go about determining period of oscillations from there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
show that acceleration is proportional to the negative of the displacement
 
?

i'm not sure how to go about that.. show it is proportional to negative displacement? Are there are any steps for this type of mathematical writeup? any ideas or help would be appreciated. thanks again.
 
If you can prove the thatF= -kx
where F is the resaultant force on the rod x is displacement and k is a constant, then this is a SHM.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K