Determine the weight of a titanium sphere

AI Thread Summary
To determine the weight of a volleyball-sized titanium sphere with a circumference of 65 centimeters, calculations yield approximately 46.070 pounds, assuming it is solid and using titanium's density of 4.506 grams. The discussion also explores the hypothetical scenario of a supervillain expelling this sphere at Mach 3 towards a 12-inch thick concrete wall. While experiments indicate that larger projectiles can penetrate concrete effectively, the sphere's shape may hinder its penetration capability compared to more aerodynamic projectiles like steel rods. Additionally, the discussion highlights that titanium's lower density compared to steel could reduce its destructive potential. Overall, while the sphere might penetrate the wall, its effectiveness is debated, and the villain's recoil from the projectile's launch could pose significant challenges.
Ari Balt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need help determining the weight, in pounds, of a volleyball-sized sphere comprised of pure titanium.
I can provide the following facts necessary for the equation:

Assume the circumference of the sphere is 65 centimeters.
Assume the sphere is solid, not hollow.
Titanium has an atomic mass of 47.876 and a density of 4.506 grams.

Any help on this would be appreciated.

NOTE: This is not for homework. If you must know, it is necessary to determine if someone is capable of creating the sphere in question in a fantasy setting role-playing game.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Circumference of a sphere is given by:

d_c=2\pi R

find R and substitute to the equation for the volume of a sphere

V=\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3

and multiply by the density to get mass.

Lastly, covert from pounds to kilograms. 1pound =~0.45 kilograms.
 
Using those formulas, my answer came out to be 46.070 pounds, rounded to the nearest thousandths place assuming I found the correct answer.

For the sake of pretense, let's say a supervillain can expel this 46-lb. titanium sphere at Mach 3, or 1 kilometer per second. He directs this expulsion at a concrete wall from a distance of 300 feet, standing directly perpendicular to the wall. Upon impact, does the sphere penetrate the wall, bounce off, or disintegrate?

Let's assume the concrete wall is 12 inches thick with a hollow area behind it. (It's a bunker, if that matters.)
 
Now that's a question that can't be answered with simple calculations.

Experiments in materials science, like these:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X02001082
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X98000086
(paywalled, but you can read the graphs if you strain your eyes a little)

using 20 and 30 mm diametre steel rods, show penetration of concrete slabs up to 2 metre thick, at speeds close to 1km/s.
Larger projectiles show better penetration.

The projectiles are shown post-test without any noticeable deformation.

The shape of a sphere is less suited for penetration, as it's got a higher cross-section(impact area) to weight ratio than a long cone-tipped rod. Additionally, steel is better suited for the purposes, due to its higher density.
(Titanium is always talked about as being superior to steel in popular media, but that's just considering the aplications that require weight-saving while retaining similar mechanical properties, like with submarines. Your super villain would be more destructive if he could make steel spheres. Or better yet, tungsten of uranium - the denser the better.)

The two articles linked were one of the first that popped up when I googled concrete penetration with projectiles, so it's conceivable that you should be able to find something more definitive with more effort.

You might get somebody in the engineering/materials science section to help you find what you need.Also, consider that an 80kg man shooting a 20kg projectile at 1km/s will be thrown back at 250 m/s due to the conservation of momentum(aka recoil). This might be a very short-lived career of villainy for this guy.
 
Last edited:
This is a total guess, but at Mach 3 I'd expect it to punch a hole straight through 12 inches of concrete.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top