Determining a parameter so that it's a removable singularity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining a parameter \( a \) such that the function \( f(x) = \frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)} \) has a removable singularity at \( x=2 \). Participants explore the conditions under which the limit as \( x \) approaches 2 exists and differs from the value of the function at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for the limit to exist at \( x=2 \) while ensuring that \( f(2) \) is undefined. There are questions about how to factor the numerator to simplify the expression and achieve the desired removable singularity.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions required for \( a \) to ensure the limit exists as \( x \) approaches 2. Some participants suggest that the limit must be independent of the value of \( f(2) \), while others are questioning how to manipulate the expression to achieve the necessary simplification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function is undefined at \( x=2 \) and \( x=4 \), and there is a focus on finding a suitable value for \( a \) that allows for the cancellation of the indeterminate form at \( x=2 \).

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
Determine ##a## so that ##f(x)=\frac{ax^2-16}{x^2-6x+8}## has a removable singularity for ##x=2##
Relevant Equations
none
So, for this exercise I'm considering the removable singularity for ##x=2## to cause ##f(2)## to be different from ##\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##.
But as soon as I write everything down, I get stuck here: ##\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)\neq\frac{4(a-4)}{0}##
How do I calculate ##a##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}=\frac{...?}{x-4}
 
Last edited:
greg_rack said:
So, for this exercise I'm considering the removable singularity for ##x=2## to cause ##f(2)## to be different from ##\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##.

This isn't what you want. You need the limit to exist. Then, you can remove the singuality by defining ##f(2)## to be the value of the limit.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}=\frac{...?}{x-4}
Mmm, I didn't get that... Have you factored the numerator to simplify that ##(x-2)## at the denominator? If yes, why? And how, since there is an ##'a'##?
 
PeroK said:
This isn't what you want. You need the limit to exist. Then, you can remove the singuality by defining ##f(2)## to be the value of the limit.
Wait... I do need a singularity, a so-called "removable" one. If ##f(2)=\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##, the function would be continuous in 2, and that's not what I want. Correct?

EDIT, from Wikipedia: In analysis, a removable singularity of a function is a point at which the function is undefined.
 
greg_rack said:
Wait... I do need a singularity, a so-called "removable" one. If ##f(2)=\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)##, the function would be continuous in 2, and that's not what I want. Correct?
That is what you want. A removable singularity means the limit exists and allows you to create a continuous function.

Note that whether the ##\lim_{x \rightarrow 2} f(x)## exists does not depend on ##f(2)##.

Whatever you do ##f(2)## cannot be defined by evaluating the given expression. That will always have ##0## on the denominator, hence be undefined.
 
PeroK said:
That is what you want. A removable singularity means the limit exists and allows you to create a continuous function.

Note that whether the ##\lim_{x \rightarrow 2} f(x)## exists does not depend on ##f(2)##.
And so how do I establish ##a##? Which conditions should I use
 
greg_rack said:
And so how do I establish ##a##? Which conditions should I use
The limit must exist. The answer is screaming at you from your original post!
 
greg_rack said:
If yes, why? And how, since there is an ′a′?
Because if (x-2) disappears from denominator you do not have to worry about singularity at x=2.
Find a good value of 'a' so that you can do it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
  • #10
PeroK said:
The limit must exist. The answer is screaming at you from your original post!
God, I'm feeling so dumb!😂
The limit should therefore exist, independently from what the value of ##f(2)## is, so as @anuttarasammyak said I should find the value of ##a## for which ##\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}## exists(?)
 
  • #11
greg_rack said:
The limit should therefore exist, independently from what the value of ##f(2)## is, so as @anuttarasammyak said I should find the value of ##a## for which ##\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-4)(x-2)}## exists(?)
Yes, you need that limit to exist as ##x \rightarrow 2##.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Yes, you need that limit to exist as ##x \rightarrow 2##.
Ok then, and what about ##f(2)##? My textbook says it should not exist or at least be different from the value of the limit.
 
  • #13
greg_rack said:
Ok then, and what about ##f(2)##? My textbook says it should not exist or at least be different from the value of the limit.
##f(2)## is undefined if all you have is that formula for ##f(x)##:
$$f(2) = \frac{4a - 16}{0}$$
Which is undefined, no matter what ##a## is. The function you have been given is not defined at ##x =2## or ##x =4##. If we take ##a = 0##, then ##f(x) = \frac{-16}{(x-2)(x-4)}##.

That has non-removable singularities at ##x = 2## and ##x = 4##. This is because the function blows up around ##x = 2## and ##x = 4##. Note that it's the behaviour of the function close to these points that is important.

You need to find some ##a## which makes the function well behaved close to ##x = 2##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
  • #14
PeroK said:
You need to find some a which makes the function well behaved close to x=2.
I'm finally getting there! Last easy and merely algebraical question: how do I determine ##a## so that the factor which gives indetermination(##(x-2)##) in $$\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-2)(x-4)}$$ can be simplified?
 
  • #15
greg_rack said:
I'm finally getting there! Last easy and merely algebraical question: how do I determine ##a## so that the factor which gives indetermination(##(x-2)##) in $$\frac{ax^2-16}{(x-2)(x-4)}$$ can be simplified?
What would you like to get rid of from the denominator? What do you need on the numerator?
 
  • #16
PeroK said:
What would you like to get rid of from the denominator? What do you need on the numerator?
I should get rid of ##(x-2)## by having another ##(x-2)## on the numerator, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K