Determining Air Resistance Force on Fire Helicopter's Water Bucket

AI Thread Summary
To determine the air resistance force on a fire helicopter's water bucket, the problem involves a 564 kg bucket suspended from a 19.2 m cable at a 46° angle while flying at 41.6 m/s. The initial approach using the drag formula was incorrect due to miscalculating the relevant area and misunderstanding the forces acting on the bucket. A free body diagram clarified that the forces include the weight of the bucket, drag force, and tension in the cable, leading to the correct equations for tension. By applying trigonometric relationships, the final calculated air resistance force was found to be approximately 5723.58 N, confirming the correct method. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying forces and using appropriate formulas in physics problems.
EcKoh
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A fire helicopter carries a 564 kg bucket of water at the end of a 19.2 m long cable. Flying back from a fire at a constant speed of 41.6 m/s, the cable makes an angle of 46.0° with respect to the vertical. Determine the force of air resistance on the bucket.

Knowns:
m = 564 kg
d1 = 19.2 m
v = 41.6 m/s
\vartheta = 46.0


Homework Equations



For Drag:
Fd =(1/2)CdpAv2


The Attempt at a Solution



So first I started by making a triangle out of the vertical and findin the values of the sides, the first being d1:

d2 = 19.2 sin 46.0 = 13.81
d3 = 19.2 cos 46.0 = 13.38

Then I used the pythagorean theorem (a2 + b2 = c2) to check the values. I also subtracted to find the last angle of the triangle (180-90-46 = 44), but I don't think I needed that.

So now I used the drag formula (Fd =(1/2)CdpAv2). I used p =1.29 because that's what it equals at sea level, but since its a helicopter I don't know if I used the right value. How to I calculate this?

Then I made Cd 1.15 because that is the drag coefficient of a small cylinder according to my textbook. Is this right?

Next, I used the formula A=1/2bh to get A = 92.39

Plugging this in I get Fd = (1/2)(1.15)(1.29)(92.39)(41.62) = 124366.0155

And I know this is wrong. The answer should be 5.72×103 N. Where did I go wrong? And how would I go about fixing this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're over-complicating things and incorrectly using the formula for force due to air resistance. Drag in that formula is a function of the cross-sectional area of the bucket as seen by the wind - that is information you do not have according to your problem statement - the area of the triangle you have calculated is not relevant.

Instead, draw a free body diagram for the bucket. What are the forces acting on it? The weight of the bucket, the force due to drag, and the tension from the cable. You should be able to draw that triangle of forces - use the magnitude of the force that you know and the angle of the triangle to find the magnitude of the other force you need.
 
Okay, I am drawing the free body diagram right now. Would I be correct to say that normal force isn't acting on the bucket?
 
EcKoh said:
Okay, I am drawing the free body diagram right now. Would I be correct to say that normal force isn't acting on the bucket?

A normal force as a result of its contact with what surface, exactly..?
 
Okay so I redrew it, and finally figured it out hours later. Here is my solution, please let me know if I did this right or just happened to fall upon the correct answer:

First I redrew the free body diagram just as I had before, labeling tension (T) in the rope, force of drag (Fd) pointing away from the bucket and the direction of movement, and W=mg pointing down.

Then I used the x-axis and y-axis to get two formulas:

T sin \theta = F
T cos \theta = mg

This allowed for me to change it to tan \theta = F/mg

Then I plugged in 564 for mass 46 for \theta, and 9.8 for gravity, giving me an answer of 5723.58 N.

Is this the correct method?
 
That's spot on, EcKoh. Well done. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top