• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Determining ceramic particle sizes suspended in a fluid

  • Thread starter Tiberious
  • Start date
  • #1
73
3

Homework Statement


(I) An experiment to determine ceramic particle sizes showed that the rate of descent when suspended in a fluid ranged from 1.2 × 10–6 m s–1 to 5 × 10–6 m s–1. 



The density of the material was 3800 kg m–3 and the density and viscosity of the fluid at room temperature were 1632 kg m–3 and 0.00972 Pas respectively. Calculate the range of sizes of the particles. 


Homework Equations



Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 21.13.34.png

The Attempt at a Solution



Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 21.12.06.png
[/B]
Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 21.12.12.png

Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 21.12.17.png


I've recently completed the above, though the diameters have not yet been calculated. Does the rearrangement of the original equation look correct ?
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
797
269
Tangential, we used to measure particle size of an antacid dispersal and an iron supplement by an electrical method related to blood-cell counting.

IIRC, a representative dilution was trickled through a submerged capillary nozzle, and the variations in conductivity between carrier and carrier + particle cleverly logged by multiple parallel 'box-car' circuits. Getting it to work reliably was a bit of an art, to say the least. My understanding was that its digital replacement was rather more user-friendly...
 
  • #3
73
3
Thank-you, any ideas as towards the rearrangement of the formula ?
 
  • #4
Tom.G
Science Advisor
2,995
1,730
Just from an Algebraic standpoint, the re-arrangement looks good to me!

However I wonder about the particle sizes. In particular their are no units-of-measure in the problem statement. Are the units consistent in your numerical representation?
 
  • #5
73
3
Screen Shot 2019-01-20 at 13.26.40.png


As the question was in microns and the material in milli, I've converted to milli.

The above should read mm. Apologies for that.
 

Attachments

  • #6
33,888
9,606
You should keep units, otherwise it is difficult to catch conversion errors.
The denominator still has (omitted) meters everywhere, for example.
 
  • #7
Borek
Mentor
28,326
2,705
A bit tangential to the problem, but it can make googling for additional materials easier: this is an application of Stokes' law, common in measurement of dynamic viscosity (η in your equations).
 
  • #8
73
3
Screen Shot 2019-01-23 at 21.43.00.png


Hiya all really appreciate the feedback, Ive added some units to the equation. Does the above seem accurate ? Any obvious omissions ?
 

Attachments

  • #9
33,888
9,606
$$d = \sqrt{\frac{18_{0.00972}0.0050}{(3800-1632)9.81}}$$
I don't see any units there, the correct units would need conversion to cancel, and I don't understand why ##\eta## is written as subscript.

You can use LaTeX here in forum posts by the way, just put it in double # (inline) or double $ (separate line).
 
  • #10
Borek
Mentor
28,326
2,705
and I don't understand why ##\eta## is written as subscript.
Perhaps because ##180.009720.0050## was unreadable (as apposed to ##18\times0.00972\times0.0050##)
 
  • #11
73
3
Apologies the subscript was an error when I read the original equation, it was actually to the base of that figure. I've corrected in the attached and included the relevant units within the equation.

Latex is something I will certainly need to learn.

Screen Shot 2019-01-24 at 20.55.27.png
 

Attachments

  • #12
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,516
4,964
As the question was in microns
View attachment 237765
No, the question as posted is all in SI (MKS) units The values of the speeds merely happen to be in the micron/sec range. So there is no need to do any conversions.

In the attachment in post #11, each μ should be m.
And having obtained 0.0012 10-3m, what happened to the 10-3, and what happened to the s-1?

Edit: and what did you think of the 5cm diameter answer you got?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
33,888
9,606
And having obtained 0.0012 10-3m, what happened to the 10-3, and what happened to the s-1?
And the m3 of the density, and the units of g and the viscosity. Out of 5 factors in the expression only the dimensionless 18 is without error.

@Tiberious: Get your units right. Physics does not work without units.
 
  • #14
73
3
@haruspex, larger than expected, I see my error converting at the start and will arrange the units accordingly in my answer. Appreciate the assistance.
 

Related Threads for: Determining ceramic particle sizes suspended in a fluid

Replies
1
Views
548
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
836
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top