Determining ethanol and methanol content in homemade booze

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for determining the ethanol and methanol content in homemade alcoholic beverages. Participants explore various techniques, including density measurement, freezing point depression, and enzymatic assays, while considering the implications of methanol presence in fermentation processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest estimating ethanol content through density measurement, assuming negligible methanol presence.
  • Others highlight the challenges of accurately measuring methanol, noting that reliable methods typically require mass spectrometry.
  • One participant mentions that methanol is produced from pectin during fermentation, particularly when using high-pectin materials like fruit.
  • There is a discussion about the legality and safety of distilling fermentation products, with some cautioning against it unless one is knowledgeable.
  • Freezing point depression is proposed as a method for estimating alcohol content, but it requires the assumption that only ethanol is present.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the presence of sugars in the beer, suggesting that separating alcohol from sugars is necessary for accurate quantification.
  • Enzymatic methods are discussed, with one participant mentioning the need for specific assays that can distinguish between methanol and ethanol.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the practicality of suggested methods, questioning their reliability and accuracy.
  • Classical detection methods involving oxidation are mentioned, but their reliability and quantitative nature are also questioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method for determining ethanol and methanol content. Multiple competing views and techniques are presented, with varying levels of skepticism about their effectiveness.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in the proposed methods, including assumptions about the presence of other solutes and the potential for significant measurement uncertainty.

Superposed_Cat
Messages
388
Reaction score
5
Hi, I've recently made some very budget homemade 'beer', butt I'm wondering is there an easy (doesn't have to be accurate) way to determining ethanol and methanol content. any help appreciated.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Nothing easy and obvious. Ethanol can be estimated by measuring the density, assuming no methanol present (or present in negligible quantities). Methanol is a problem in general, as far as I remember nothing below mass spectrometry is reliable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
:/ Ja, I was thinking specific gravity for ethanol content but the methanol is the issue as you say. Just don't want to go blind and die from methanol poisoning. Thanks though.
 
In fermentation, methanol is produced from pectin. If you ferment materials that have a high pectin content (e.g. fruit, rather than grain) the methanol content will be higher, but it's unlikely to be a health hazard. You can reduce this by adding "pectic enzyme" (trade names pectolase, pectinase, etc) to break down the pectin before it ferments. It is more of an issue in wine making that brewing.

If you are distilling fermentation products, methanol is a much more serious issue - but that is probably an illegal activity, so not a topic for discussion on PF.
 
AlephZero said:
If you are distilling fermentation products, methanol is a much more serious issue - but that is probably an illegal activity, so not a topic for discussion on PF.

In many countries it is illegal, but as far as I understand in some it is not.
 
I'm not distilling don't worry
 
Freezing point depression.
 
Bystander said:
Freezing point depression.

Just like density measurement, it requires assumption nothing but ethanol is present. Any other solute and the result is off.
 
  • #10
Beer contains also lots of sugar. So you have to separate the alcohol off before you can quantify it, e.g. by distillation.
 
  • #11
im only using water yeast (added vitamin c)and sugar.
 
  • #12
Superposed_Cat said:
im only using water yeast (added vitamin c)and sugar.

How do you know how much of the sugar is consumed by the yeast and how much is left?
 
  • #13
OP wants an "easy" method: evaporate the filtered product to determine dissolved solids; do a freezing point depression to determine total concentration of dissolved materials; difference is concentration of volatiles.
 
  • #14
Pretty certainly the method is going to be enzymatic. Finding an enzyme and reagents that will convert the alcohols into something easily detectable and measurable - something coloured. The problem is do they have one that works on methanol and not ethanol? - lots of enzymes will work on both. Just google 'methanol assay' and you find a lot. And they even sell kits for it apparently, see last ref. below.

I would advise not to use a kit or method without validating it yourself with samples of known methanol and ethanol contents, - test on each alcohol separetely and mixed.

I haven't gone beyond that but quickly turned up this:

http://www.biovision.com/alcohol-dehydrogenase-activity-colorimetric-assay-kit-4164.html http://www.biovision.com/ethanol-colorimetric-fluorometric-assay-kit-2915.html

Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology
November 2002, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 607-609
Photometric Assay for Methanol in the Presence of Ethanol
Comparison of Three Colorimetric Reagents in the
Determination of Methanol with Alcohol Oxidase.1. Photometric Assay for Methanol in the Presence of Ethanol - Springer
link.springer.com/content/.../A:1020747215826.pd... -
di YV Rodionov - ‎2002 -
ethanol and methanol, involving electrochemical detec- tion of changes in O2 or ... assay of methanol and ethanol in solutions containing both these alcohols.
2. An enzymic assay for the specific determination of methanol in serum.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3319289‎
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
Bystander said:
OP wants an "easy" method: evaporate the filtered product to determine dissolved solids; do a freezing point depression to determine total concentration of dissolved materials

Really? Imagine you have 100 mL of water solution containing 1.00 g of mixture of sucrose, glucose and NaCl. Please calculate its freezing point depression - that will convince me your method will work.

To make things simple, feel free to ignore creation of ionic pairs.
 
  • #16
Superposed_Cat said:
... easy (doesn't have to be accurate) ... determining ethanol and methanol content


Step 1), f.p. depression; step 2), evaporate water and alcohols from a weighed sample, and weigh the residue (a mixture of who knows, or cares, what); step 3) subtract the 0.3 to 0.5 K contribution to total depression from the 2 to 2.5 (maybe 3 K) depression measured in step 1). 10% uncertainty plus another 10% for working on the kitchen counter --- close enough for home brewing.

For the obsessive-compulsive, redissolve the weighed residue from step 2) in water to equal the original sample weight and determine the depression due to non-volatile dissolved solids (given that biologic activity doesn't modify things too much).
 
  • #17
Classical detection is supposed to be oxidation to aldehydes with air and hot copper wire - methanol should go to formaldehyde and ethanol to acetaldehyde, and the smell of formaldehyde should be different. But is this reliable/quantitative?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
15K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K