Determining g with a Compound Pendulum: Issues with Uncertainties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration due to gravity (g) using a compound pendulum while addressing uncertainties in measurements. The user employs a photo-gate with an accuracy of +/- 0.0001s to measure the period and calculates the standard error of the mean from 20 measurements. However, the standard error sometimes appears smaller than the photo-gate's precision, prompting questions about combining uncertainties. Additionally, the user details the process of measuring the pendulum's center of mass and the associated uncertainties, seeking clarification on the correct method for combining these uncertainties using the propagation of errors formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compound pendulum dynamics
  • Familiarity with measurement tools like photo-gates and vernier calipers
  • Knowledge of statistical concepts such as standard deviation and standard error
  • Proficiency in error propagation techniques in experimental physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for combining uncertainties in measurements
  • Study the principles of error propagation in physics experiments
  • Learn about the use of photo-gates in timing experiments
  • Explore advanced techniques for measuring the center of mass in pendulum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, experimental researchers, and educators involved in mechanics and measurement accuracy in laboratory settings.

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi all!

I'm currently doing an experiment using a compound pendulum trying to determine the value of g.

I have a problem with my uncertainties:

Error in period T:
The period is measured with the use of a photo-gate of accuracy +/- 0.0001s.
For each height i did 20 measurements from which i calculated average period and from the standard deviation I have the standard error of mean. However due to the fact that I made so many measurements the standard error of mean sometimes appears to be smaller than the actual precision of the photo-gate (for example +/- 0.00007s). What should I do in this case? I'm guessing I somehow need to combine these uncertainties?

I have another question concerning the heights.
I firstly had to measure the length of the whole pendulum to find the centre of mass being in the middle. Then I mark the center of mass and measure different heights up to the edge of clamp (this all using a meter stick). Then I measure the distance between edge of clamp and axis of rotation using vernier caliper.
Overall I guess it goes like this (correct me if I'm wrong)
Uncertainty of meter stick (with the help of magnifying glass) is 1/3mm so +/- 0,3mm.
And since I use this uncertainty twice (not sure if center of mass is exactly where marked) AND then when measuring distance to edge of clamp -this gives me +/- 0,6mm and I need to combine this with the uncertainty in the distance on clamp which is +/-0,05mm. So it is sqrt(0,6^2+0,05^2)?
Thank you in advance for all the help.
PS. If you're not sure please don't reply as I don't want to get more confused than I am.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Using the propagation of errors you have \sigma _g^2=\frac{16 \pi ^4 \sigma _L^2}{T^4}+\frac{64 L^2 \pi ^4<br /> \sigma _T^2}{T^6} where all of the sigma terms are standard deviations, not standard errors.
 


DaleSpam said:
Using the propagation of errors you have \sigma _g^2=\frac{16 \pi ^4 \sigma _L^2}{T^4}+\frac{64 L^2 \pi ^4<br /> \sigma _T^2}{T^6} where all of the sigma terms are standard deviations, not standard errors.
Sorry, but I don't understand how this helps me. I thought I explained what I'm doing quite clearly. I need to know what my error for the periods and heights will be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K