Determining if a field is electrostatic or not

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitch_1211
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatic Field
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 6K views
mitch_1211
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
If i have an arbitrary vector field, say F = constant / (x^2 + y^2 +z^2)
I want to determine if it is electrostatic or not. For this I am thinking I should first determine if it is a conservative field, but not 100% sure, any guidance would be appreciated

:)

mitch
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electrostatic field has curl F=0, but the F you right is not a vector, unless "constant" is a vector.
 
clem said:
but the F you right is not a vector, unless "constant" is a vector.
Yea i think its a trick question, the F is bold in the example I'm looking at, but then there are no vector directions on the right side of the = so in that case, you can't take the curl can you?
 
I think the OP refers to the modulus of a vector.Notice x^2+y^2+z^2 equals r^2.
My guess is that F is the modulus of a gravitational or electrical field. In such a case we can write the vector field using the direction cosines and, upon taking the curl of that vector, we find it's conservative.
 
If you have only the modulus of a field, you cannot determine whether it's electrostatic or not.

Of course, any time-independent vector field, which is curl free, can be an electrostatic field. The source (charge distribution) is given by

[tex]\rho=\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E},[/tex]

where I'm using Heaviside-Lorentz (rationalized Gauß) units.
 
Unless there's more hidden in the problem than stated, F = constant / (x2 + y2 +z2) is just F = constant / r2. You have not stated the direction of this vector, but I assume it is radial:
F = Fr = constant / r2
This is just the static field produced by a point source if the field is central and inverse-square-law in nature. For instance this would be the electrostatic field due to a point charge, or the gravitational field due to a point mass.
 
The radius vector, [itex]\vec{e}_r=\vec{r}/r[/itex] (with [itex]r=|\vec{r}|[/itex]) is not a constant. Of course, the Coulomb field is potential field,

[tex]\vec{E}=\frac{q}{4 \pi r^2} \vec{e}_r=-\vec{\nabla} \frac{q}{4 \pi r},[/tex]

and thus an electrostatic field. The charge distribution is

[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=-\Delta \frac{q}{4 \pi r}=q \delta^{(3)}(\vec{r}).[/tex]
 
Actually, I think the question is a bit more simple. It is asked whether or not a field is electrostatic. In other terms, if it is time-independent. By looking at the expression, there is no time variable in there. So there we have the "static" part. Now is it electrostatic? Well, from Faraday:
[tex]\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{B}}{\partial t}[/tex]

Where the right side becomes zero (time-independent). Thus, in electrostatic, we would need the electric field E to be conservative also.
 
Sure, any conservative time-independent field can be an electrostatic field. I've only shown this for the Coulomb field.