Determining if a set is a subspace

  • Thread starter Thread starter mlarson9000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Subspace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining whether a specific set of functions, defined by the condition f(1) + f(-1) = f(5), is a subspace of the vector space of all functions mapping R into R.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss closure under vector addition and scalar multiplication, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of their findings. Questions arise regarding the necessity of demonstrating equivalence to the defining axiom for scalar multiplication.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing guidance on the requirements for scalar multiplication. Multiple interpretations of the conditions for subspace criteria are being explored, particularly concerning the implications of the defining axiom.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of vector spaces, particularly focusing on closure properties and the specific functional condition provided in the problem statement.

mlarson9000
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether or not the set of all functions f such that f(1)+f(-1)=f(5) is a subspace of the vector space F of all functions mapping R into R.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think that
(f(1)+f(-1))+(g(1)+g(-1))=(f+g)(1)+(f+g)(-1)=(f+g)(5)
shows it is closed under vector addition, but I'm not sure. I'm also not sure what to do about checking scalar multiplication. I don't think that r(f(1)+f(-1)=rf(5) does anything at all for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your demonstration of closure under vector addition is fine. With respect to scalar multiplication, you are being asked to show that rf defined as (rf)(x) = r*f(x) is also an element of this vector space whenever f is.
 
So (rf)(1)+(rf)(-1)=r*(f(1)+f(-1))= rf(5) which is not equal to f(5), so it's not closed under scalar multiplication?
 
mlarson9000 said:
So (rf)(1)+(rf)(-1)=r*(f(1)+f(-1))= rf(5) which is not equal to f(5), so it's not closed under scalar multiplication?

Why are we looking at f(5)? The defining axiom is that h(1) + h(-1) = h(5) for each h in the vector space.
 
so do I only need to show (rf)(1)+(rf)(-1)=r*(f(1)+f(-1))?
 
mlarson9000 said:
so do I only need to show (rf)(1)+(rf)(-1)=r*(f(1)+f(-1))?

You also need to show that this is equivalent to (rf)(5), which may seem trivial, but necessary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K