Determining Minimum Height for Marble to Complete Loop-the-Loop

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum height required for a marble to successfully complete a loop-the-loop track. The initial energy is expressed as mgh, while the final energy includes potential and kinetic energy components at the top of the loop. A key point is the adjustment for the marble's radius, which affects the effective radius of the loop and the center of mass. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law to derive the velocity at the top of the loop and incorporating rotational energy. Ultimately, the solution hinges on accurately accounting for these factors to find the correct minimum height.
kamikaze1
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A marble rolls down a track and around a loop-the-loop of radius R. The marble has mass m and radius r. What minimum height h must the track have for the marble to make it around the loop-the-loop without falling off?

Homework Equations



What minimum height h must the track have for the marble to make it around the loop-the-loop without falling off?

The Attempt at a Solution


Find initial energy: mgh
Final energy tabulation: mg(2R) + 0.5mrg + 0.5(2/5)mr^(2)(v/r)^2
Set equal to initial energy, I obtain 2R+7/10 =h, which isn't the right answer, what did I do wrong?

I found the velocity at top by using Newton's 2nd law, i get v = squareroot(rg). I find w using constraint of wr=v. I get 2/5(mr^2) using moment of inertia for a solid sphere.

Any help would be appreciated. I'm so confused why this doesn't work out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still new to this, but it looks like you've got everything right except for the last part of your final energy calculation (the 0.5(2/5)mr^(2)(v/r)^2 part). I'm not quite sure why it's there, but I'm pretty sure that's the part that's throwing you off.
 
SchruteBucks said:
I'm still new to this, but it looks like you've got everything right except for the last part of your final energy calculation (the 0.5(2/5)mr^(2)(v/r)^2 part). I'm not quite sure why it's there, but I'm pretty sure that's the part that's throwing you off.

The last part is the kinetic rotational energy using I = (2/5)(M)(R^2)
Using kinetic rotational energy = 0.5Iw^2, I have
0.5(2/5)(MR^2)w.
using constraint wr=v, knowing that v=(rg)^0.5, I get
0.5(2/5)mr^(2)(v/r)^2

The answer isn't right.
 
The energy at the top of the loop is the potential (which you have) plus it's kinetic, since it is moving in a circle there must be an acceleration at the top equal to \frac{V^2}{R}, for this to be a minimum (IE only just making it around the loop) this acceleration must be set equal to g so we have
V^2 = gR \Rightarrow KE = \frac{1}{2}mgR
\displaystyle{\dot{. .}} mgh = mg(2R) + \frac{1}{2}mgR
Which you can then solve for the minimum height :)

EDIT: Just reread your question, the "effective" radius of the loop is changed because of the radius of the marble (the center of mass of the marble moves around a slightly smaller loops) and there is indeed rotational energy equal to \frac{1}{2}\frac{2}{5}\frac{gR}{r^2}mr^2 (again this has to be changed because the R isn't really the radius of the loop that the center of mass moves over, but I'll leave that to you)

:)
 
Last edited:
Never mind. Thanks for all your suggestions. I've just solved them. I left out the little tiny details which messed up the problems. I didn't take into account of the center of mass, which I paid dearly.
Here is how I solved it.
Initial energy: mg(h+r)
At the loop, the radius is R-r because we're taking into account of the center of mass. Hence using Newton's 2nd law.
m(v^2)/(R-r) = mg, solve for v = (g(R-r))^0.5 (1)

Final energy at top of the loop is:
mg(2R-r) + 0.5(m)(g(R-r)) + 0.5(2/5)(mr^2)(w^2).
Using velocity constraint, w=v/r=(1/r)(g(R-r))^0.5
Plug that in (1), and set (1) equal to initial energy, then solve for h.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K