How Do You Calculate the Charges on Two Pieces After a Split?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scholio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Particle
Click For Summary
To solve the problem of calculating the charges on two pieces after a split, the total charge of 25 microcoulombs must be conserved. The force of repulsion between the pieces is given as 1000 Newtons when they are 3 cm apart. By using the equation F = k(qa)(qb)/r^2 and substituting qb as (25*10^-6 - qa), a quadratic equation in terms of qa can be derived. After solving the quadratic, the charges qa and qb were found to be approximately 1.99*10^-5 coulombs and 5.05*10^-6 coulombs, respectively, which sum to the original charge. The calculations confirm that the approach and final values are correct.
scholio
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a charged object having 25 microcoulombs on it breaks into two pieces. if the force of repulsion between the two pieces i 1000Newtons when the pieces are 3cm apart, what is the charge on each piece? assume pieces act as a point charges

Homework Equations



E = F/qtest = k(qa)/r^2 where F is the attractive/repulsive force

F = k(qa)(qb)/r^2 where k is 9*10^9, qa is charge of one piece, qb is charge of other piece, r is the radius between pieces


The Attempt at a Solution



firstly, do i assume the parts broken into are the same size/charge as each other? i don't think so, correct?

basically i used the second eq and set F = 1000, r = 0.03m, k = 9*10^9 and solved for qa in terms of qb

i then used the first eq and subbed in F =1000, qtest = 25*10^-6 coulombs and set that equal to kqa/r^2, where i subbed in what i got from the second eq in for qa and solved for qb

i got 2.5*ac^-5 coulombs for qb, i used qb in the second eq and got a qa of 4*10^-6

i know i did something wrong because when i sum the charges of each piece, qa and qb, i get less than the entire charge value given (25 microcoulombs). i get a sum of 2.9*10^-5 coulombs

is my approach even close, help appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK you starting from the right place, but I think you making this more complicated than it has to be:

F=1000N=\frac{kq_aq_b}{r^2}

The problem is that you have two variables, q_a and q_b.

HINT: Can you plug in and expression for q_b in terms of q_a in the above equation using what you know? Think conservation of charge. If so, you should then be able to solve for q_a, and thus, q_b using the expression you used previously.
 
how about substituting in (25*10^-6 - q_a) in for q_b where 25*10^-6 is 25 microcoulombs?

when i subbed that in for q_b the eq you gave produced a quadratic equation in terms of q_a, i did the quadratic formula and got 225415.9 and -415.9

i'm not too sure on units because it is coulombs that is impossible... help?

__________%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%________________

actually i incorrectly calculated the quadratic eq, for q_a i got 1.99*10^-5 and 5.05*10^-6 coulombs, which one do i use for q_a? I'm guessing the second one...

well i chose correctly because when i subbed that value back in and solved for b i got 1.98*10^5
so q_a + q_b = 2.5*10^-5 =25*10^-6 = 25 microcoulombs
1.98*10^-5 + 5.05*10^-6 = 2.5*10^-5

YES correct!

Thanks so much G01
 
Last edited:
Anytime. Good Job! :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K