Determining Path Length in a Double Slit Experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining path length in a double slit experiment when the distance from the slits to the screen is not negligible. The key formula derived includes the excess path length as dsin(θ) + (dcos(θ))²/(2r₁), where d is the slit separation, θ is the angle to the screen, and r₁ is the distance from the slits to the point on the screen. This approach accounts for both the perpendicular drop and additional terms due to the finite distance to the screen, providing a comprehensive method for calculating path differences in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave interference principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of geometric optics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving angles and distances
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of path length differences in various interference patterns
  • Study the impact of screen distance on interference fringes in double slit experiments
  • Learn about the significance of significant figures in experimental physics
  • Investigate advanced topics in wave optics, such as diffraction and polarization
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in wave optics, particularly those studying interference patterns and the mathematical modeling of light behavior in experiments.

CINA
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
In a double slit, when the distance between the screen is NOT small (i.e. the rays r1 and r2 are not parallel) how is path length determined?

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
So the distance from the slits to the screen is not small? That is the usual case in books, and in that case r1 and r2 are parallel! So you'd drop a perpendicular, and calculate the excess path that one of the rays takes.

If the screen is not infinite away from the slits but still far away, and assuming that the point on the screen that you want to calculate the intensity is above the top slit, then you'd still drop a perpendicular and calculate the excess path which would be d*sin(theta), but also in addition there'll be a term [d*cos(theta)]^2/(2r1), for a total difference in length of path:

[tex]dsin(\theta)+\frac{(dcos(\theta))^2}{2r_1}[/tex]

where d is the distance between slits, theta is the angle to the screen from the top slit, and r_1 is the distance to the point on the screen from the slits.

At least I think this is right. My geometry is not so good, as are my skills at keeping track what order approximations I'm using (I also have trouble with significant figures).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K