Determining the Centroid of a 3D Section

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the centroid of a 3D section formed by three intersecting planes in the context of slab design. Participants explore various approaches to compute the centroid, including the application of moment calculations and the interpretation of relevant equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the formula for the centroid and seeks clarification on the numerator and denominator in the equation provided.
  • Another participant proposes defining the lengths of the planes and calculating moments to derive the centroid location, suggesting a formula based on total length and moments.
  • A different perspective suggests rethinking the problem as a center of mass calculation, introducing a mass per length variable and discussing how it simplifies the centroid calculation.
  • Further questions arise regarding the integral bounds and the reasoning behind the constants used in the calculations, specifically the factor of 2 and the uniformity of the mass distribution.
  • One participant attempts to apply the discussed methods to a modified scenario with an additional plane, leading to a discrepancy in the calculated centroid location.
  • Some participants encourage others to think critically about the problem rather than relying solely on references or formulas, emphasizing understanding the definition of a centroid.
  • A later reply indicates a realization of the misunderstanding regarding the dimensionality of the problem, leading to a corrected understanding of the centroid calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes multiple competing views on how to approach the centroid calculation, with no consensus reached on the best method or interpretation of the equations involved. Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion, indicating that the topic remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of the centroid calculation, particularly regarding the assumptions made about the geometry and material properties. There is also mention of unresolved mathematical steps and the need for clarity on the definitions used in the calculations.

CivilSigma
Messages
227
Reaction score
58

Homework Statement


[/B]
I am having a problem understanding a calculation performed as part of a bigger solution in the design of Slabs.

That is, how to determine the centroid of the critical shear section, which consist of 3 planes intersecting to form a 3D model (please see attached picture). For this particular case, there is no fourth shear plane that encloses with the other planes. So, the 3D figure is "open" on one side.

So excluding details of design, I am having trouble understanding how the authors compute the shear centroid which is just the location of the centroid on the top.

Homework Equations


Please see attached picture.
https://imgur.com/a/dxwWD

The author defines 'e' as the location of the centroid of critical shear, and the value of e is:
$$e=\frac{805^2}{2 \cdot 805+610}$$

Can one please explain the above formula? I presume the denominator is the perimeter of the shape, but I cannot figure out what the numerator represents.Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Define the two long parallel legs as length L, and the short connecting legas W. Then the total length is
Ltotal = 2*L + W
Now, calculate moments about the short edge:
Mom = 2 * int(x dx, x = 0 .. L) = 2 * (x^2/2) between 0 and L = 2 * (L^2/2) = L^2
By definition, the centroid is such that
Mom = e * Ltotal or
e = Mom/Ltotal =L^2/(2*L+W)
Then plug in the numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma
Te moment calculations make sense, thank you.

But why is the definition Moment = e * Perimeter ? This seems odd to me, can you please explain it further?

Can you please recommend some articles to read , I'm not sure what to Google as searching for centroid calculation gives me the concepts in 2D which I am familiar with.
 
Re-think this as a center of mass calculation. Assign a value mu = mass/length that is the same for all three sides.
The first step is the calculation of the total mass
Mtotal = mu*(2*L+W)
Now calculate the moment of the mass distribution,
Mom = 2 * int(mu*x dx, x = 0 .. L) = mu*2 * (x^2/2) between 0 and L = mu*2 * (L^2/2) = mu*L^2
Finally, make the CM location calculation by
e = Mom/Mtotal and note that mu is in both numerator and denominator and thus drops out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma
I am trying to follow this, but I have some more questions, if I may:

1. Where does the 2 come from in the integral ? Were the integral bounds -L to L ? If that's the case, can you please clarify the axis location?

2. By assigning mu = mass / length, are we treating the 3D plane as a line surface in 2D. And why is mu the same for all three edges? Is it because the material is uniform, therefore the "density" mu (but mu has units [Mass] / [ Length] not [Length ^3] ) is therefore equal per edge?

3. If we repeat the same calculation but now consider a fourth plane near the free end, then e = 805/2 =402.5. But when I try this using the above method,
e = L^2 / (2L+2W) = 805^2 / (2*805+2*610) = 229 ?
 
I think maybe it is time for me to let someone else try to explain this to you.
 
Dr.D said:
I think maybe it is time for me to let someone else try to explain this to you.

Am I really that off on all 3 points?
 
Please Dr. D, if you can just provide me with a reference to read or to research, I would appreciate it.

I need to figure this out to complete the problem I am working on
 
I really do not think you need a reference. I think that what is needed is for YOU to THINK about this simple problem. Start with the definition of a centroid and work from there, forgetting all reference to formulae, examples, etc. How would YOU solve this problem? If you don't know the definition of a centroid, look it up (the 'net is your friend).
 
  • #10
Dr.D said:
I really do not think you need a reference. I think that what is needed is for YOU to THINK about this simple problem. Start with the definition of a centroid and work from there, forgetting all reference to formulae, examples, etc. How would YOU solve this problem? If you don't know the definition of a centroid, look it up (the 'net is your friend).

Ha! I get it now !
I really needed to think about it :)

What confused me was that I was trying to find the centroid of the plane in 2D that lays on top.

But now I understand that the "shape" we have is simply of 3 sides folded. Then the centroid of that section is:

$$ \bar{y} = \frac{\int ydA}{\int dA}$$

$$\bar{y} = \frac{ 2* \cdot \int_0^L y \cdot depth \cdot dy + 0} {2L \cdot depth + W \cdot depth}$$

2 times the integral since we have two identical side faces
and the third face's moment is 0 because I am taking moments about that axis
Depth factor cancels out to give us the location of the centroid from the short axis as:

$$\bar{y} = \frac{L^2}{2L+W}$$Thank you again Dr.D !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
24K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
14K
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K