Determining the power of frictional force

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between frictional force and power in the context of a rolling sphere on an incline. It is established that the frictional force opposes the sphere's motion, yet the sphere's velocity increases as it rolls down. The key point is that the power associated with static friction remains constant and is effectively zero, as static friction does not dissipate mechanical energy. The confusion arises from the interpretation of the velocity in the power equation, which must consider the motion of the contacted surface rather than the center of mass. Ultimately, the power due to static friction remains constant due to its nature of not doing work on the system.
Gourab_chill
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The question was:
As a ball rolls down the inclined plane, the power of gravitational force Pg and frictional force Pf thereafter :-
(A) Pg increases with time and Pf remains constant with time
(B)Pg as well as Pf remain constant with time.
(C) Pg as well as Pf increase with time.
(D)Pg remains constant and Pf decreases with time.

The correct answer is (A). But my question is how come?
Relevant Equations
P=F.v
I can say that the frictional force always against the rolling sphere and the velocity is increasing for the ball. So The dot product F.v keeps on getting more and more negative, so how can the Pf remain constant? Well the velocity increases along the incline and the force of gravity is down the incline too so the Fg keeps on increasing, right? Or am I making a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gourab_chill said:
(A) Pg increases with time and Pf remains constant with time
[...]
The correct answer is (A). But my question is how come?
[...]
I can say that the frictional force always against the rolling sphere and the velocity is increasing for the ball. So The dot product F.v keeps on getting more and more negative, so how can the Pf remain constant?
My best guess is that it is something of a trick question. Since the ball is rolling down the plane, the frictional force is from static friction. The force of static friction dissipates no mechanical energy. So the power associated with it is constant and zero.

For this to be the intended explanation, one must count the work done by static friction in terms of the motion of the contacted surface rather than in terms of the motion of the center of mass. The equation:$$P=\vec{F} \cdot \vec{v}$$ does not tell you what ##\vec{v}## is the velocity of. It matters.

[It also does not tell you what reference frame to use, but we can assume the lab frame in which the inclined plane is at rest. That choice eliminates some complications that might otherwise arise]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Gourab_chill
jbriggs444 said:
For this to be the intended explanation, one must count the work done by static friction in terms of the motion of the contacted surface rather than in terms of the motion of the center of mass. The equation:$$P=\vec{F} \cdot \vec{v}$$ does not tell you what ##\vec{v}## is the velocity of. It matters.

Yes, i agree that's the reason behind the power being constant; it is actually zero.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K