Determining the Radius of Convergence for a Series with Limited Limit Points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the radius of convergence for a series involving the expression \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty (3 + (-1)^n)^n z^n\). Participants are exploring the application of the Cauchy-Hadamard criterion and the nature of limit points in the context of this series.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the Cauchy-Hadamard criterion and the implications of having only two distinct limit points (1 and 3) for the sequence of coefficients. There is also a debate about the definition of limit points and subsequential limits, particularly in relation to constant and alternating sequences.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions about limit points and the application of the Cauchy-Hadamard criterion. Some participants suggest that the original poster may have mixed up details from different problems, while others are clarifying the nature of the sequences involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the coefficients of the series, with one participant admitting to mixing up details from different sources. This has led to further exploration of how to properly apply the convergence criteria to sequences with a limited number of terms.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Could someone please help me out with the following? I need to determine the radius of convergence of the following series. It is exactly as given in the question.

[tex] \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {\left( {3 + \left( { - 1} \right)^n } \right)^n } z^n [/tex]

The suggestion is to use the Cauchy-Hadamard criterion. The nth coefficient of this series is a_n = (3+(-1)^n)^n which is positive so |a_n|^(1/n) = (3 + (-1)^n). At first thought there are two limit points of the set of points of |a_n|^(1/n), 1 and 3. So the radius of convergence is R = 1/(limpsup(...)) = (1/3) which is the answer that is given.

The problem is that the set of points of the sequence (3 + (-1)^n) only consists of two points, 1 and 3. So how can it have any limit points? (No neighbourhood of either of these two points contains an 'infinite' number of points of the set since there are only two different points.)

Can someone please explain how to do this question properly? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that a 'constant' sequence, like 3 , 3, 3, 3, ..., does not converge? Hmm, given [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex], how would I find "N" so that if n> N, [itex]|a_x- 3|< \epsilon[/itex]? Looks to me like, since |3- 3|= 0< [itex]\epsilon[/itex], any N would work. 3 is not a "limit point" in the topological sense but it definitely is a limit of that sequence. However, 1 and 3 are NOT subsequential limits of the sequence [itex](3+ (-1)^n)^n[/itex]. When n is odd, we have (3+ (-1)n)= 3- 1= 2 and when n is even (3+ (-1)n)= 3+ 1= 4. The two subsequential limits are 2 and 4.
 
Hmm...I mixed up questions from two sources because they looked similar. The coefficient should've had a 2 in place of the 3, my bad.

(2+(-1)^n) alternates between 1 and 3 but I don't see how the Cauchy-Hadamard criterion can be applied here. I suppose that for sequences with a finite number of different terms I only need to work out limits of the subsequences.
 
I think you're over complicating this.

[tex]\limsup _{n \to \infty} (2 + (-1)^n) = 3[/tex]
 
But the question was about 2+ (-1)n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K