Determining the Radius of the Moon (Ratio and shadow measurements)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the radius of the Moon using shadow measurements during a solar eclipse. The participant has derived the radius of the Earth's shadow in a photograph as 6.80 cm with an uncertainty of ±0.40 cm and the radius of the Moon as 2.75 cm with an uncertainty of ±0.1 cm. The calculated ratio of the Earth's radius to the Moon's radius is approximately 2.47, but the participant acknowledges a significant error due to the assumption that the Earth's shadow is the same size as the Earth itself. The discussion emphasizes the need to account for the projection effect caused by the Sun's finite distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry and ratios
  • Familiarity with shadow projection concepts
  • Knowledge of lunar and solar eclipses
  • Basic skills in measurement and uncertainty analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of shadow projection in astronomy
  • Learn about the geometry of lunar and solar eclipses
  • Study methods for calculating uncertainties in measurements
  • Explore the effects of distance on light rays and shadow size
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, students studying celestial mechanics, educators teaching eclipse phenomena, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of astronomical measurements.

BenMur
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I have been going through some old OU books on the sciences and started working through an exercise when I came to a stumbling block. I have come here in the hope that someone may be able to shed some light on my problem. This is all for personal study as I am not enrolled on any courses in the subject and just wish to expand my mind.

Homework Statement



The exercise I am going through is part of an old OU science module that belonged to my mother. Unfortunantely she no longer has the videos which I need to explain to me what I need to do next to correct my results.

Basically the exercise makes the assumption that the shadow cast by the Earth on to the surface of the moon during a solar eclipse is the same size as the Earth itself. Now whilst I have an idea why this is not the case the assumption stands through most of the exercise in order to show a method of calculation to the student.

Through the use of the photos of the moon showing different phases of a partial eclipse I am asked to make measurements to estimate the radius of the Earth in the photograph.

Before I explain any more I would like to show everything I have calculated thus far in the exercise.

(Exact correct figures may not be used during the exercise as the learning experience is more to do with the approach than the results)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The radius of the Earth's shadow in the photograph is:

less than 7.2 cm (upper limit)
more than 6.4 cm (lower limit)

Radius of Earth's shadow in the photograph (RE) = 6.80cm +/- 0.40cm

Radius of the Moon in the photograph = (RM) 2.75cm +/- 0.1cm

Therefore the Radius of the Earth is 2.47 times bigger than the radius of the moon.

RE = 2.47 RM

Limits of Uncertainty


Max Ratio = 7.2/2.65 = 2.72
Min Ratio = 6.4/2.85 = 2.25

Therefore RE = (2.47 +/- 0.22) RM

Now RE = 2.47 RM (Text book uses a figure of 6200km for Earth's radius)

So 6200/2.47 = RM

RM = 2510

I then calculate the limits of uncertainty for distance using the earlier numbers and get:

RM = 2510 +/- 231 km

This is the extent of my working out

Having gotten this far through the exercise I read the following:

"One word of caution about this calculation of RM: throughout Section 3 [the above] you make the assumption that the shadow of the Earth at the Moon is the same size as the Earth itself. As you will see in the TV programme, this is an unjustified assumption that leads to a considerable error in the value obtained for RM. However, the programme also shows how to correct this error, so be prepared to adjust your value of RM after viewing."

Unfortunately I don't have this TV program and have been unable to obtain a copy or find anything similar avaliable. So I have come here in the hope that one of you brilliant minds can assist me in completeing this exercise by explaining to me what I am missing and how to correct my inital results.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's possible that they are referring to the fact that the Sun is not at an infinite distance, so it's rays are not strictly parallel. During a lunar eclipse the Moon is an additional distance d ~ 384400 km from the Earth's distance to the Sun of about D ~ 1.496 x 1011 m. There will be a "projection effect". Draw a diagram and work out the magnification.
 
The sun is not a "point source". We see only the full shadow (umbra) really dark on the Moon, which is smaller than the size of Earth.

LEDiagram1c.JPG


ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
4K