Determining the ratio of volumes

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1729
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio Volumes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the ratio of volumes of gold and silver in a crown based on its weight in air and water. The crown weighs 58.8 N in air and 54.8 N submerged, leading to a calculated total volume of 0.0004 m³. Using the densities of gold (19,300 kg/m³) and silver (10,100 kg/m³), participants derive equations to express the masses and volumes, ultimately confirming that the ratio of volumes is 1:1, corresponding to option (a).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Archimedes' principle and buoyancy
  • Familiarity with density calculations and the formula ##V=\frac{m}{\rho}##
  • Basic algebra for solving linear equations
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between Newtons and kilograms
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Archimedes' principle in greater detail
  • Study the relationship between mass, weight, and density
  • Learn how to set up and solve systems of linear equations
  • Investigate the implications of buoyancy in different fluids
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying fluid mechanics and material properties, as well as educators looking for practical examples of density and buoyancy calculations.

1729
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A crown is made out of silver and gold. Its weight is 58.8 N in air, and 54.8 N when submerged in water.
What is the ratio of ##V_{\mathrm{gold}}## to ##V_{\mathrm{silver}}## in the crown?

##\rho_{\mathrm{gold}}=19300\frac{\mathrm{kg}}{\mathrm{m^3}}##
##\rho_{\mathrm{silver}}=10100\frac{\mathrm{kg}}{\mathrm{m^3}}##
##\rho_{\mathrm{water}}=1000\frac{\mathrm{kg}}{\mathrm{m^3}}##

(a) ##\frac{V_{\mathrm{gold}}}{V_{\mathrm{silver}}}=\frac{50}{50}##
(b) ##\frac{V_{\mathrm{gold}}}{V_{\mathrm{silver}}}=\frac{44}{56}##
(c) ##\frac{V_{\mathrm{gold}}}{V_{\mathrm{silver}}}=\frac{40}{60}##
(d) ##\frac{V_{\mathrm{gold}}}{V_{\mathrm{silver}}}=\frac{56}{44}##

Homework Equations


(i) ##V=\frac{m}{\rho}##

The Attempt at a Solution


The volume of water displaced by submerging the crown is equal to the volume of the crown itself.
The crown weighs 58.8 N in air, which implies the mass is 6.0 kg. It weighs 54.8 N when submerged, which implies the mass in 5.6 kg in water. Since the difference in mass is equal to 0.4 kg, this means that by formula (i), the volume of the crown is 0.0004 cubic metres.

Since this is the total volume of the crown, we can put this in an equation.
##V_{crown}=\frac{m_{gold}}{\rho_{gold}}+\frac{m_{silver}}{\rho_{silver}}##

How do I continue from this point? Would it be legal to rewrite the masses as ##m=\frac{F}{g}## and thus conclude (a) is the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1729 said:
Since this is the total volume of the crown, we can put this in an equation.
##V_{crown}=\frac{m_{gold}}{\rho_{gold}}+\frac{m_{silver}}{\rho_{silver}}##

How do I continue from this point? Would it be legal to rewrite the masses as ##m=\frac{F}{g}## and thus conclude (a) is the correct answer?
Didn't understand your question at the end.
You have one equation and two unknowns. You just need one more equation. Can you think of one involving the total mass you worked out?
 
Let's say that x = mass of gold in the crown. What is the mass of silver?

If you apply the density of each material to the respective masses, do you also obtain the total volume of the crown, as determined from submerging it in water?
 
Thanks for the input guys. I feel like this question is way easier than I make it out to be, but I just can't connect the dots.
SteamKing said:
Let's say that x = mass of gold in the crown. What is the mass of silver?
##m_{total}-x##
SteamKing said:
If you apply the density of each material to the respective masses, do you also obtain the total volume of the crown, as determined from submerging it in water?
I don't know. I plugged these numbers in the equation and solved for ##x##:
##0.0004 \ \mathrm{m^3} = \frac{x}{19300 \ \mathrm{\frac{\ kg}{m^3}}}+\frac{6.0 \mathrm{kg}-x}{10100 \ \mathrm{\frac{kg}{m^3}}}##
##\Leftrightarrow x=4.1 \ \mathrm{kg}##
If you were to calculate the volumes using ##V=\frac{m}{\rho}##, and were to check the ratio it produces, you would notice it satisfies none of the four possible answers given. My intuition would give you an affirmative answer to your question, but I can't ignore this calculation that contradicts that assertion.
So, the answer is: "no"?
haruspex said:
Didn't understand your question at the end.
You have one equation and two unknowns. You just need one more equation. Can you think of one involving the total mass you worked out?
Just ignore the last question, I've worked it out to be false.

I don't see what other equation I would need. I've tried rewriting the masses in relation to each other -- see the calculation above -- but I suppose that's a dead end.
 
The easiest thing is to work with the volumes of gold and silver. Let Vg be the volume of gold in the crown and let Vs be the volume of silver in the crown. In terms of Vg, what is the weight of gold in the sample? In terms of Vs, what is the weight of silver in the sample? These have to add up to the total weight. In terms of Vg and Vs, what is the total volume of the crown? What is the upward force exerted by the water on the crown when the crown is submerged (in terms of Vg and Vs). You should now have two equations in the two unknowns Vg and Vs. What are these two equations, and what are their solutions?

Chet
 
Hi Chet,

Thank you for taking the time to reply.
After spending a multitude of hours on this problem today, it seems that I've formulated a linear system whose solutions appear to indicate (a) is the correct answer. Could you please have a look at it and confirm whether or not my reasoning is incorrect?

WolframAlpha link
##4 \ \mathrm{N}=\rho_{water}g(V_g+V_s)##
##58.8 \ \mathrm{N}=\rho_gV_gg+\rho_sV_sg##
##\Leftrightarrow V_g=V_s## which implies ##\frac{V_g}{V_s}=\frac{50}{50}##
 
1729 said:
Hi Chet,

Thank you for taking the time to reply.
After spending a multitude of hours on this problem today, it seems that I've formulated a linear system whose solutions appear to indicate (a) is the correct answer. Could you please have a look at it and confirm whether or not my reasoning is incorrect?

WolframAlpha link
##4 \ \mathrm{N}=\rho_{water}g(V_g+V_s)##
##58.8 \ \mathrm{N}=\rho_gV_gg+\rho_sV_sg##
##\Leftrightarrow V_g=V_s## which implies ##\frac{V_g}{V_s}=\frac{50}{50}##
Yes. Your formulation is exactly what I envisioned. I haven't checked your "arithmetic."

Chet
 
Great, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
695
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K