Developing Direct Simulation Monte Carlo and I have problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validation of a Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) code, specifically focusing on viscosity calculations in Couette Flow using Nitrogen at a temperature of 273K. The user reports a viscosity value of 1.5e-5, which is lower than the expected experimental value of 1.656e-5. The user suspects that cell size may be a contributing factor but has already set it to half or a quarter of the mean free path, which is standard for DSMC simulations. Recommendations include comparing results with other DSMC simulations and utilizing OpenFOAM's DSMC solver for further validation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) methodology
  • Familiarity with viscosity calculations in fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of OpenFOAM and its DSMC solver capabilities
  • Basic principles of Couette Flow and Knudsen number
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to implement and use OpenFOAM's DSMC solver for viscosity calculations
  • Explore existing DSMC simulation benchmarks to compare results
  • Investigate the impact of cell size on DSMC simulations and viscosity outcomes
  • Look for academic theses or publications that provide DSMC simulation data for Nitrogen
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for computational fluid dynamicists, researchers developing DSMC codes, and anyone involved in validating simulation results against experimental data in gas dynamics.

Noh-hoon Lee
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Please understand my low command of English.

I'm developing Direct Simulation Monte Carlo and I'm now validating.

To validate my DSMC code, I'm checking the viscosity in Couette Flow.

Simulation Condition is, Kn = 0.0056(Near Continuum) and Gas is Nitrogen, Temperature is 273K.

Nitrogen viscosity is approximately 1.656e-5 but in my simulation, viscosity is now 1.5e-5.

I can't understand why viscosity is lower than experimental value.

I have thougt it is caused by cell size. But I set the cellsize as half or quarter of mean free path.

It is common value of DSMC simulation.

I'm now wating for your advice :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, instead of experiment, you should compare your results to someone else's simulation done with the same parameters. Search for some open source DSMC programs and use them as a benchmark.
 
I try to find some thesis or simulation data but It was hard to find that.
I found DSMC-IP data but I need DSMC data. DSMC data is too hard to find.
So I try to compare my result to exact viscosity
 
Thank you for your help. I'll try to use OpenFoam and to modify the code to get the viscosity data. You show me the way
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
628
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K