Development of Integration by Substitution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the development of Integration by Substitution and Trigonometric Substitution, exploring their theoretical foundations and practical applications in calculus. Participants seek to understand the historical context and the mathematical reasoning behind these techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a more comprehensive explanation of Integration by Substitution, noting that their calculus book lacks detail.
  • Another participant describes the relationship between Integration by Substitution and the Chain Rule, providing a basic example to illustrate the concept.
  • A third participant references a proof from Courant's treatment of calculus, explaining the introduction of a new variable and how it relates to the Chain Rule and integral calculus.
  • One participant formally outlines the process of trigonometric substitution using a specific integral example, while also acknowledging the possibility of a mistake in their reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the development and application of Integration by Substitution and Trigonometric Substitution. There is no consensus on a singular approach or understanding, as different methods and examples are presented without resolution of disagreements.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention limitations in their calculus textbooks and the need for deeper insights into the proofs and applications of these techniques. There are also indications of potential errors in reasoning, particularly in the example provided for trigonometric substitution.

chaotixmonjuish
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
How was Integration by Substitution and Trig Substitution developed? My calc book doesn't have much info, just a short (not really complete) proof. Could someone explain and/or lead me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is reverse of the chain rule.
(For simplicity sake assume that [tex]f(x)[/tex] and [tex]g(x)[/tex] are differentiable everywhere).

Given [tex]f(x)[/tex] let [tex]F(x)[/tex] be any anti-derivative (which we know exists by the fundamental theorem of calculus). Now consider [tex]F(g(x))[/tex]. What is the derivative of that? Using the chain rule we fine [tex]F'(g(x))g'(x)[/tex] but [tex]F'(x) = f(x)[/tex] because it is an anti-derivative. So [tex][F(g(x))]' = f(g(x))g'(x)[/tex]. This means [tex]F(g(x))[/tex] is an anti-derivative of [tex]f(g(x))g'(x)[/tex]. So [tex]\int f(g(x))g'(x) dx = F(g(x))+C[/tex].

Here is an example. Say we want to find [tex]\int (x+1)^5[/tex]. We can let [tex]f(x) = x^5[/tex] and [tex]g(x)=x+1[/tex]. Now confirm that [tex](x+1)^5 = f(g(x))g'(x)[/tex]. So the anti-derivative is [tex]F(g(x))+C[/tex] but [tex]F(x) = (1/6)x^6[/tex]. So [tex]F(g(x))+C = (1/6)(x+1)^6 + C[/tex]. That is is.

Of course, I did the most basic example. But that is how I do my integrations. I never use the calculus book approach because it does not provide any insight like you said.
 
Yes, as Kummer said, it is Integral calculus's counterpart of The Chain Rule from Differential Calculus. Courant's treatment of Calculus, Volume 1, has a nice proof wish I will post because I'm nice =] Just note from this point on, the following is not my own work.
----------------------------------------------------

We suppose that a new variable u is introduced into a function F(x) by means of the equation [itex]x=\phi (u)[/itex] so that F(x) becomes a function of u:
[tex]F(x) = F( \phi (u) ) = G(u)[/tex].

By the chain rule of differential calculus:
[tex]\frac{dG}{du} = \frac{dF}{dx} \phi ' (u)[/tex].

If we now write
[tex]F'(x) = f(x) \mbox{and} G'(u) = g(u)[/tex], or the equivalent expressions [tex]F(x) = \int f(x) dx \mbox{and} G(u) = \int g(u) du[/tex]

then on one hand the chain rule takes the form [tex]g(u) = f(x) \phi ' (u)[/tex]
and on the other hand [itex]G(u) = F(x)[/itex] by definition, that is,
[tex]\int g(u) du = \int f(x) dx[/tex], and we obtain the integral formula equivalent to the chain rule: [tex]\int f( \phi (u)) \phi '(u) du = \int f(x) dx , {x=\phi (u)}[/tex].
----------------------------------------------------------

Trig substitution is merely the case where the substitution happens to be a trigonometric function.
 
Here is how trigonometric substitution works formally using the substitution rule.

Consider [tex]\int \sqrt{1-x^2} \ dx[/tex] (on [tex](-1,1)[/tex].)

We can write, [tex]\int \frac{1-x^2}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} \ dx[/tex].
Let [tex]g(x) = \sin^{-1} x[/tex] then [tex]g'(x) = \left( \sqrt{1-x^2} \right)^{-1}[/tex]. And [tex]f(x) = \cos^2 x[/tex] then [tex]f(g(x)) = 1-x^2[/tex]. This means,
[tex]\int f(g(x))g'(x) dx = F(g(x))+C[/tex].
Where [tex]F(x)[/tex] is an anti-derivative of [tex]\cos^2 x[/tex]. Which is [tex]F(x) = \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{1}{2}\sin x\cos x[/tex] now evaluate this at [tex]g(x) = \sin^{-1} x[/tex] which gives [tex]\frac{1}{2}\sin^{-1} x + \frac{1}{2} x \sqrt{1-x^2}[/tex].

I might have a mistake because I was not careful. But you get the idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K