Diagonalizing of Hamiltonian of electron and positron system

Davidllerenav
Messages
424
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
The spin-dependant Hamiltonian of an electron-positron system in the presence of a uniform magnetic field in the z-direction ##(\vec{B}=B\vec{k})## can be written as

##\hat{H}=\lambda \hat{\vec{S}}_1\cdot\hat{\vec{S}}_2+\left(\frac{eB}{mc}\right)(\hat{S}_{1_z}-\hat{S}_{2_z})##

##\lambda## is a constant and ##\hat{\vec{S}}_1## and ##\hat{\vec{S}}_2## are the Spin operators of the electro and positron respectively. Find the energy eigenvalues and eigenvectors by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian
Relevant Equations
##\hat{\vec{S}}=\hat{\vec{S}}_1+\hat{\vec{S}}_2##
##s_1=1/2##
##s_2=1/2##
##m_1=\pm 1/2##
##m_2=\pm 1/2##
##m=m_1+m_2##
##s=0,1##
What I did was first noting that ##\hat{\vec{S}}_1\cdot\hat{\vec{S}}_2=\frac{1}{2}(\hat{\vec{S}}^2-\hat{\vec{S}}_1^2-\hat{\vec{S}}_2^2)##, but these operators don't commute with ##\hat{S}_{1_z}## and ##\hat{S}_{2_z}##, this non the decoupled basis ##\ket{s_1,s_2;m_1,m_2}## nor the coupled one ##\ket{s,m}## are eigenfunctions of this Hamiltonian. So I need to find the eigenvectors.

I tried to find the matrix of the Hamiltonian, but I'm confused about how should I write the components of the matrix, since I've only done it when I have a given ##s##, but here I have ##s=0,1##. All I know is that the matrix must be a ##4\times 4## one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Davidllerenav said:
I tried to find the matrix of the Hamiltonian, but I'm confused about how should I write the components of the matrix, since I've only done it when I have a given ##s##, but here I have ##s=0,1##. All I know is that the matrix must be a ##4\times 4## one.
You can choose any convenient set of basis states for the system. For example, you could choose the four direct-product states

##\ket{1} = \ket{\uparrow}_e \ket{\uparrow}_p \equiv \ket{\uparrow \uparrow}##
##\ket{2} = \ket{\downarrow}_e \ket{\uparrow}_p \equiv \ket{\downarrow \uparrow}##
##\ket{3} = \ket{\uparrow}_e \ket{\downarrow}_p \equiv \ket{\uparrow \downarrow}##
##\ket{4} = \ket{\downarrow}_e \ket{\downarrow}_p \equiv \ket{\downarrow \downarrow}##

The arrows denote spin up or down along the z-axis.

Can you find the matrix elements of ##H## in this basis, such as ##H_{32} = \bra{3} H \ket{2}##?

Note, for example, that $$\hat S_{1_y} \hat S_{2_y} \ket{2} = \hat S_{e_y} \hat S_{p_y}\ket{2} = \hat S_{e_y}\hat S_{p_y}\ket{\downarrow \uparrow} \equiv \left( \hat S_{e_y} \ket{\downarrow}_e \right) \left( \hat S_{p_y} \ket{\uparrow}_p \right) = \left(- i \frac{\hbar}{2}\ket{\uparrow}_e \right) \left(i \frac{\hbar}{2} \ket{\downarrow}_p \right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{4}\ket{\uparrow \downarrow} = \frac{\hbar^2}{4}\ket{3} $$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top