Diagonalizing of Hamiltonian of electron and positron system

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on diagonalizing the Hamiltonian for a system of electrons and positrons, noting the challenge of non-commuting operators that complicate finding eigenfunctions. The matrix representation of the Hamiltonian is identified as a 4x4 matrix, but confusion arises regarding how to construct its components given the total spin values of s=0 and s=1. Participants suggest using a convenient basis of direct-product states to facilitate calculations. The discussion includes examples of how to compute matrix elements, such as H_{32}, using specific spin states. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of constructing the Hamiltonian matrix and finding its eigenvectors in this spin system.
Davidllerenav
Messages
424
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
The spin-dependant Hamiltonian of an electron-positron system in the presence of a uniform magnetic field in the z-direction ##(\vec{B}=B\vec{k})## can be written as

##\hat{H}=\lambda \hat{\vec{S}}_1\cdot\hat{\vec{S}}_2+\left(\frac{eB}{mc}\right)(\hat{S}_{1_z}-\hat{S}_{2_z})##

##\lambda## is a constant and ##\hat{\vec{S}}_1## and ##\hat{\vec{S}}_2## are the Spin operators of the electro and positron respectively. Find the energy eigenvalues and eigenvectors by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian
Relevant Equations
##\hat{\vec{S}}=\hat{\vec{S}}_1+\hat{\vec{S}}_2##
##s_1=1/2##
##s_2=1/2##
##m_1=\pm 1/2##
##m_2=\pm 1/2##
##m=m_1+m_2##
##s=0,1##
What I did was first noting that ##\hat{\vec{S}}_1\cdot\hat{\vec{S}}_2=\frac{1}{2}(\hat{\vec{S}}^2-\hat{\vec{S}}_1^2-\hat{\vec{S}}_2^2)##, but these operators don't commute with ##\hat{S}_{1_z}## and ##\hat{S}_{2_z}##, this non the decoupled basis ##\ket{s_1,s_2;m_1,m_2}## nor the coupled one ##\ket{s,m}## are eigenfunctions of this Hamiltonian. So I need to find the eigenvectors.

I tried to find the matrix of the Hamiltonian, but I'm confused about how should I write the components of the matrix, since I've only done it when I have a given ##s##, but here I have ##s=0,1##. All I know is that the matrix must be a ##4\times 4## one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Davidllerenav said:
I tried to find the matrix of the Hamiltonian, but I'm confused about how should I write the components of the matrix, since I've only done it when I have a given ##s##, but here I have ##s=0,1##. All I know is that the matrix must be a ##4\times 4## one.
You can choose any convenient set of basis states for the system. For example, you could choose the four direct-product states

##\ket{1} = \ket{\uparrow}_e \ket{\uparrow}_p \equiv \ket{\uparrow \uparrow}##
##\ket{2} = \ket{\downarrow}_e \ket{\uparrow}_p \equiv \ket{\downarrow \uparrow}##
##\ket{3} = \ket{\uparrow}_e \ket{\downarrow}_p \equiv \ket{\uparrow \downarrow}##
##\ket{4} = \ket{\downarrow}_e \ket{\downarrow}_p \equiv \ket{\downarrow \downarrow}##

The arrows denote spin up or down along the z-axis.

Can you find the matrix elements of ##H## in this basis, such as ##H_{32} = \bra{3} H \ket{2}##?

Note, for example, that $$\hat S_{1_y} \hat S_{2_y} \ket{2} = \hat S_{e_y} \hat S_{p_y}\ket{2} = \hat S_{e_y}\hat S_{p_y}\ket{\downarrow \uparrow} \equiv \left( \hat S_{e_y} \ket{\downarrow}_e \right) \left( \hat S_{p_y} \ket{\uparrow}_p \right) = \left(- i \frac{\hbar}{2}\ket{\uparrow}_e \right) \left(i \frac{\hbar}{2} \ket{\downarrow}_p \right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{4}\ket{\uparrow \downarrow} = \frac{\hbar^2}{4}\ket{3} $$
 
Last edited:
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...